Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-182591038
Thanks - I've merged this in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-181965541
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-181965539
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-181964783
**[Test build #50979 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50979/consoleFull)**
for PR 10965 at commit
[`fab3fb2`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-181927110
**[Test build #50979 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50979/consoleFull)**
for PR 10965 at commit
[`fab3fb2`](https://gi
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-181784411
@nongli Okay, I'll let you know the plan first. plz give me some time to
look around similar codes in `Parquet` and `Orc`.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user nongli commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-181520467
The benchmark LGTM and I think this is useful.
@maropu Before you make significant changes to this, can you write up what
you plan to do?
---
If your project
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-181177811
the benchmark infra is updated, I think we need to rerun it and update the
results.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-181048306
@nongli ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-180240077
cc @nongli is this useful?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-180233817
@rxin Could you give me any comment on this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-180233354
I tried to use `DeltaBinaryPackingValuesReader` and
`DeltaBinaryPackingValuesWriter` in `parquet-column` package.
```
Benchmark
Running benchmark: INT De
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-180226842
The size of in-memory columnar cache is much bigger than parquet data on
disk because Spark uses simpler compression algorithms than parquet does in
`CompressionSchemes`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-178438278
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-178438079
**[Test build #50546 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50546/consoleFull)**
for PR 10965 at commit
[`cc58f20`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-178438281
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-178412175
**[Test build #50546 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50546/consoleFull)**
for PR 10965 at commit
[`cc58f20`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-176028625
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-176028621
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-176027860
**[Test build #50254 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50254/consoleFull)**
for PR 10965 at commit
[`b3bf70c`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965#issuecomment-176000161
**[Test build #50254 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50254/consoleFull)**
for PR 10965 at commit
[`b3bf70c`](https://gi
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10965
[SPARK-13057][SQL] Add benchmark codes and the performance results for
implemented compression schemes for InMemoryRelation
This pr adds benchmark codes for in-memory cache compression to make futur
23 matches
Mail list logo
