Github user cloud-fan closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179545082
Thanks, merging.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179314804
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179078359
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179078362
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179078181
**[Test build #50648 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50648/consoleFull)**
for PR 11042 at commit
[`6b5a100`](https://g
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179053489
Memo: `CodegenContext.references` can only hold `Expression` objects in
branch-1.6. That's why the error message can't be moved to codegen references
like what #11035
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179038564
**[Test build #50648 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50648/consoleFull)**
for PR 11042 at commit
[`6b5a100`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179035304
The error message looks like:
```
[info] Cause: java.lang.RuntimeException: Null value appeared in
non-nullable field:
[info] - field (class: "scala.Int"
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179031182
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179031184
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179029825
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179029824
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179017933
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179017936
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179017913
**[Test build #50639 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50639/consoleFull)**
for PR 11042 at commit
[`9f8c41e`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-179008824
**[Test build #50639 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50639/consoleFull)**
for PR 11042 at commit
[`9f8c41e`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-178966343
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-178966345
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-178966339
**[Test build #50635 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50635/consoleFull)**
for PR 11042 at commit
[`c2bc287`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042#issuecomment-178965056
**[Test build #50635 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/50635/consoleFull)**
for PR 11042 at commit
[`c2bc287`](https://gi
GitHub user cloud-fan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11042
[SPARK-13101][SQL][branch-1.6] nullability of array type element should not
fail analysis of encoder
nullability should only be considered as an optimization rather than part
of the type system,
22 matches
Mail list logo
