Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-194406185
fyi https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-13775 to sort by completed
time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user zjffdu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-190245248
agree with sorting on start time. different mode has different format of
app_id. sorting by start time is more reasonable.
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-190240878
I don't mind the change if @zhuoliu doesn't since the original idea was to
sort by start time. Meh, maybe the JIRA title could be updated but not a big
deal.
---
If yo
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-190234286
since this is just changing the default order to descending I'm going to
check this in, if we want to change which column its sorted by lets file a
separate jira.
Github user zhuoliu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-189516371
This basically provides a default view of sorting when the page is loaded.
User can easily sort by start time or other columns by clicking the column name.
---
If your
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-19246
So we could. I was hoping for it to be similar to the YARN RM ui where it
sorted by app id. To me its also most intuitive to have first column sorted.
The
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-15864
Could we just sort by start time? that sounds like the goal.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-11477
+1 on this. @srowen let me know if you have concerns still or if we didn't
describe well enough.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-188799267
descending puts all the applications with application_ in the order with
most recent on top. Since its still sorting alphabetically it puts the local-
before the appl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-188795344
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-188795346
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-188794748
**[Test build #51965 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51965/consoleFull)**
for PR 11357 at commit
[`dfe86bc`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-188747186
**[Test build #51965 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/51965/consoleFull)**
for PR 11357 at commit
[`dfe86bc`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-188745917
Descending by app ID != most recent first, right? I could see an argument
for the latter but I'm not sure that's what this does. In your example, you
even see it shows "
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-188745439
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357#issuecomment-188560207
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user zhuoliu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11357
[SPARK-13481] Desc order of appID by default for history server page.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Now by default, it shows as ascending order of appId. We might pref
18 matches
Mail list logo
