Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-203076036
ttp
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202696168
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202696162
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202696165
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202696161
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202695926
**[Test build #54400 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54400/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202695991
**[Test build #54401 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54401/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202675749
**[Test build #54404 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54404/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202675826
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202675819
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202675332
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202675334
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202675186
**[Test build #54388 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54388/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202671868
Alright, this should now be ready for an initial review pass. I just pushed
a somewhat hacky patch to work around the direct buffer allocation limit
(42d0356) and
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202671881
/cc @andrewor14 @davies for review
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202671558
**[Test build #54404 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54404/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202657707
**[Test build #54401 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54401/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202651594
**[Test build #54400 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54400/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202640177
**[Test build #54388 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54388/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-202616817
Discovered a potentially major problem: if we bail out of a getOrElseUpdate
call and don't end up caching a block and then do not fully consume or dispose
of the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201984448
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201984454
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201984028
**[Test build #54272 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54272/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201971414
**[Test build #54272 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54272/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201676097
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201676104
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201675517
**[Test build #54239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54239/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201617490
Looks pretty good actually. There are some details about naming and on/off
defaults we need to figure out, but that can go in later.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201601318
**[Test build #54239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54239/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201586342
/cc @andrewor14, @nongli, @rxin, can you glance over the PR description to
check whether the user-facing semantics are okay for now? We might want to
change some
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201569804
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201569812
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201569358
**[Test build #54215 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54215/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201506253
**[Test build #54215 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54215/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201113965
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201113964
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201113647
**[Test build #54125 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54125/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201086372
**[Test build #54125 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54125/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201073322
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201073319
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201073194
**[Test build #54096 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54096/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-201037802
**[Test build #54096 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/54096/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-200081984
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-200081981
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-200081722
**[Test build #53825 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53825/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-200047288
**[Test build #53825 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53825/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-200037304
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-200037294
**[Test build #53819 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53819/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-200037299
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-200036926
**[Test build #53819 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53819/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-198142114
**[Test build #53483 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53483/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-198141906
**[Test build #53483 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53483/consoleFull)**
for PR 11805 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-198142116
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user JoshRosen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805
[SPARK-13992][WIP] Add support for off-heap caching
This patch adds support for caching blocks in the executor processes using
direct / off-heap memory. I'll expand the description later; this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11805#issuecomment-198142117
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
55 matches
Mail list logo
