[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-2704] Name threads in ConnectionManager...

2014-07-26 Thread rxin
Github user rxin commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1604#issuecomment-50246511 @tgravescs I think you created this. Please take a look. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-2704] Name threads in ConnectionManager...

2014-07-26 Thread rxin
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1604 [SPARK-2704] Name threads in ConnectionManager and mark them as daemon. You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull https://github.com/rxin/spark daemon

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-2704] Name threads in ConnectionManager...

2014-07-26 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1604#issuecomment-50246561 QA tests have started for PR 1604. This patch merges cleanly. brView progress: https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17226/consoleFull ---

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-2704] Name threads in ConnectionManager...

2014-07-26 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1604#issuecomment-50247796 QA results for PR 1604:br- This patch PASSES unit tests.br- This patch merges cleanlybr- This patch adds no public classesbrbrFor more information see test

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-2704] Name threads in ConnectionManager...

2014-07-26 Thread mateiz
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1604#issuecomment-50249860 Looks good, merged this. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-2704] Name threads in ConnectionManager...

2014-07-26 Thread mateiz
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1604#issuecomment-50249875 Oh sorry, I didn't see you wanted Tom to take a look at it too. Would be good to get his feedback. I just looked at the patch... --- If your project is set up for it,