GitHub user dbtsai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897
[SPARK-2979][MLlib ]Improve the convergence rate by minimize the condition
number
Scaling to minimize the condition number:
During the optimization process, the convergence (rate) depends on the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-51862223
QA tests have started for PR 1897. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18347/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-51865332
QA results for PR 1897:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-51870344
QA tests have started for PR 1897. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18356/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-51871303
QA tests have started for PR 1897. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18358/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-51872737
QA results for PR 1897:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-51873603
QA results for PR 1897:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#discussion_r16099150
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/GeneralizedLinearAlgorithm.scala
---
@@ -137,11 +154,45 @@ abstract class GeneralizedLinearAl
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#discussion_r16099170
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -185,6 +185,58 @@ class LogisticRegressionSuite exte
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#discussion_r16099253
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/GeneralizedLinearAlgorithm.scala
---
@@ -137,11 +154,45 @@ abstract class GeneralizedLinearAl
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#discussion_r16153527
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/GeneralizedLinearAlgorithm.scala
---
@@ -137,11 +154,45 @@ abstract class GeneralizedLinearAl
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#discussion_r16221810
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/regression/GeneralizedLinearAlgorithm.scala
---
@@ -137,11 +154,45 @@ abstract class GeneralizedLinearAl
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-52145394
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-52145716
QA tests have started for PR 1897. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18521/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-52148128
QA results for PR 1897:- This patch FAILED unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-52149135
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-52149162
Seems that Jenkins is not stable. Failing on issues related to akka.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-52149464
QA tests have started for PR 1897. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/18527/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-52152780
QA results for PR 1897:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1897#issuecomment-52226905
LGTM. Merged into both master and branch-1.1. Thanks!!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
21 matches
Mail list logo
