Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-126942028
This was fixed by #5806, so I think we can close this issue / PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHu
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97882197
/cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97860008
[Test build #31422 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31422/consoleFull)
for PR 5806 at commit
[`6db4bf5`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97860087
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/314
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97860080
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97855667
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97855596
[Test build #31421 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31421/consoleFull)
for PR 5806 at commit
[`7fc4a98`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97855674
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/314
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97818339
[Test build #31422 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31422/consoleFull)
for PR 5806 at commit
[`6db4bf5`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97817733
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97817791
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97816395
[Test build #31421 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31421/consoleFull)
for PR 5806 at commit
[`7fc4a98`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97815883
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97815915
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97732087
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/314
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97732074
[Test build #31410 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31410/consoleFull)
for PR 5806 at commit
[`d5a9933`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97732086
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97712629
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97712669
[Test build #31410 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/31410/consoleFull)
for PR 5806 at commit
[`d5a9933`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806#issuecomment-97712608
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
GitHub user scwf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5806
[SPARK-4699][SQL] make caseSensitive configurable in Analyzer.scala
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/scwf/spark case
Alternatively
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-89087424
ping.
Thanks for working on this! However, to keep the PR queue small, I propose
we close this issue until you have time to update it.
---
If your project is
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#discussion_r27184692
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystConf.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#discussion_r27184655
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystConf.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#discussion_r27184671
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -39,11 +40,17 @@ object SimpleAnalyzer extends Analyzer(E
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-75378528
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-75378526
[Test build #27816 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27816/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`664d1e9`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-75378104
[Test build #27815 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27815/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`12eca9a`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-75378106
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-75376882
[Test build #27816 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27816/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`664d1e9`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-75376674
[Test build #27815 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/27815/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`12eca9a`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-72705867
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-72705843
[Test build #26660 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26660/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`39e369c`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-72698496
[Test build #26660 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/26660/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`39e369c`](https://githu
Github user jackylk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-70803953
Please run the test again. I tested all sql and hive test case locally, and
no error is reported. I am not sure why online test fails
---
If your project is set up for i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-70473988
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-70473982
[Test build #25755 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25755/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`dee56e9`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-70469261
[Test build #25755 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25755/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`dee56e9`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-70459454
[Test build #25751 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25751/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`05b09a3`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-70459458
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-70456370
[Test build #25751 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25751/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`05b09a3`](https://githu
Github user jackylk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-70456295
I have updated the code based on SPARK-3965 (SPARK-5168)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. I
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-69476078
I think this should probably go in after #3965. We can have some parent
trait in catalyst that the SQL version can extend. That way we can just pass
the configuration
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68603019
[Test build #25015 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25015/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`73c16b1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68603021
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68601740
[Test build #25015 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25015/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`73c16b1`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68598122
[Test build #25014 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25014/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`9bf4cc7`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68598124
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68596910
[Test build #25014 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25014/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`9bf4cc7`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68596320
[Test build #25013 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25013/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`005c56d`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68596321
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68596085
[Test build #25012 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25012/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`6332e0f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68596087
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68596075
[Test build #25013 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25013/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`005c56d`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68595828
[Test build #25012 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25012/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`6332e0f`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68595566
[Test build #25011 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25011/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`8753610`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68595569
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68595324
[Test build #25011 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/25011/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`8753610`](https://githu
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-68394247
ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67745356
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67745351
[Test build #24673 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24673/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`578d167`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67743789
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67743788
[Test build #24675 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24675/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`fcbf0d9`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67743445
[Test build #24675 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24675/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`fcbf0d9`](https://githu
Github user jackylk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67743335
modified according to @marmbrus, a CatalystConf trait is added and used in
Analyzer and Catalog
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67742932
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67742930
[Test build #24674 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24674/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`e7bca31`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67742900
[Test build #24674 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24674/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`e7bca31`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67742081
[Test build #24673 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24673/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`578d167`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67741939
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67741937
[Test build #24672 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24672/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`210915f`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67741917
[Test build #24672 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24672/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`210915f`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67741434
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67741433
[Test build #24671 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24671/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`91b1b96`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67741385
[Test build #24671 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24671/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`91b1b96`](https://githu
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-67412045
I like the idea of having a configuration interface in catalyst that
SQLConf can inherit from. We can then pass that into the analyzer.
I do want the HiveContex
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-66291005
That's a good point, Can we make another interface that SqlConf inherit
from? Or can we move the SqlConf into the module `Catalyst`? Any other idea?
---
If your p
Github user jackylk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65892057
If we go for second way, it will create cyclic dependency between
spark-catalyst and spark-sql sub-projects, because SQLConf and SQLContext is in
spark-sql while Analyzer
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65346490
And it will be nice if you can also add test suite for this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65345962
Great, you're right, please make the change.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user jackylk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65340071
@chenghao-intel agreed.
Besides, I think the caseSensitive passing to SimpleCatalog also needs to
be changed
here:
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/s
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65334998
The change LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65334620
I think we probably have to always keep the HiveContext analyzer case
INSENSITIVE, See
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/Hive/LanguageManual+DDL, Hive wi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65292399
[Test build #24051 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24051/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`578d167`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65292413
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65281697
[Test build #24051 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24051/consoleFull)
for PR 3558 at commit
[`578d167`](https://githu
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65281098
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65281087
Thanks for working on this! What about HiveContext?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
GitHub user jackylk opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558
[SPARK-4699][SQL] make caseSensitive configurable in Analyzer.scala
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/jackylk/spark case
Alternat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3558#issuecomment-65270774
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
91 matches
Mail list logo
