Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-93594809
Manually fixed conflicts while merging with master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as we
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-93110412
[Test build #30279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30279/consoleFull)
for PR 5237 at commit
[`3175c2f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-93110441
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user mhseiden commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-93077853
@yhuai - The Limit case is covered as well.
@marmbrus - Not a problem! My most recent PR addresses your comments. Is
this a change that could be backported to 1.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-93076044
[Test build #30279 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30279/consoleFull)
for PR 5237 at commit
[`3175c2f`](https://githu
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-92485811
Seems `new SparkSqlSerializer(new SparkConf(false))` is also used in
`org.apache.spark.sql.execution.Limit`. Can you fix that as well?
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-91955687
Thanks for working on this. This LGTM with two minor comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#discussion_r28199691
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/columnar/ColumnTypeSuite.scala ---
@@ -229,3 +267,23 @@ class ColumnTypeSuite extends FunSuite with Lo
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#discussion_r28199689
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Exchange.scala ---
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ case class Exchange(newPartitioning: Partitioning, chil
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-91953138
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-91953132
[Test build #30093 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30093/consoleFull)
for PR 5237 at commit
[`e5011fb`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-91937795
[Test build #30093 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30093/consoleFull)
for PR 5237 at commit
[`e5011fb`](https://githu
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-91937365
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237#issuecomment-87183235
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
GitHub user mhseiden opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5237
[SPARK-5277][SQL] - SparkSqlSerializer doesn't always register user
specified KryoRegistrators
[SPARK-5277][SQL] - SparkSqlSerializer doesn't always register user
specified KryoRegistrators
16 matches
Mail list logo