[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-20 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-133105996 **[Test build #1677 timed out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1677/console)** for PR 8320 at commit [`200afdc`](https://githu

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-20 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-133048006 [Test build #1677 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/1677/consoleFull) for PR 8320 at commit [`200afdc`](https://git

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-20 Thread tgravescs
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-133009685 Thanks @squito I'll start looking at it and get somethings running. It will probably be next week by the time I have some results. --- If your project is set up for i

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132875776 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132875777 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132875736 **[Test build #41293 timed out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41293/console)** for PR 8320 at commit [`200afdc`](https://github

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132838921 [Test build #41293 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41293/consoleFull) for PR 8320 at commit [`200afdc`](https://gith

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132838159 Merged build triggered. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132838183 Merged build started. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132836139 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132836087 [Test build #41283 has finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41283/console) for PR 8320 at commit [`06c8ffa`](https://github.

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132836138 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread SparkQA
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132798963 [Test build #41283 has started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41283/consoleFull) for PR 8320 at commit [`06c8ffa`](https://gith

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132797403 Merged build triggered. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132797432 Merged build started. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132773224 Test FAILed. Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed): https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/41

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132773222 Merged build finished. Test FAILed. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132768202 Merged build started. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread AmplabJenkins
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132768139 Merged build triggered. --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread squito
Github user squito commented on the pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320#issuecomment-132767770 @tgravescs You can try this out for handling caching for over 2GB. I've tried it out some but haven't really stressed it, interested in your feedback. --- If your proje

[GitHub] spark pull request: [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks o...

2015-08-19 Thread squito
GitHub user squito opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8320 [SPARK-6236] [core] [wip] caching for blocks over 2GB This allows caching of partitions that are greater than 2GB, and also includes error messages for the other cases where we hit the 2GB limit (re