Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5061#issuecomment-84455446
Once you have updated, can you also update the PR description, as this
becomes the commit message. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5061#discussion_r26897050
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLContext.scala ---
@@ -212,6 +212,22 @@ class SQLContext(@transient val sparkContext:
SparkContext)
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5061#issuecomment-82888774
@rxin fixed, and plz check it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5061#issuecomment-82214695
You mean df.select($id, callUDF($value))?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5061#issuecomment-82607897
I meant something like
```scala
df.select($id, callUDF(simpleUDF, $value))
```
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5061#issuecomment-82673585
Ok, I'll try to refine my codes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5061
[SPARK-6379][SQL] Support an implicit conversion from udfname to an UDF
defined in SQLContext
This is useful for using pre-defined UDFs in SQLContext;
val df = Seq((id1, 1), (id2, 4), (id3,
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5061#issuecomment-82109406
Can't we make this explicit by using callUDF?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5061#issuecomment-82108605
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
