Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-94115122
This looks fine. The previous setting was very confusing to the user
because they would have run into this by following the docs. Thanks for fixing
this I'm merging th
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-94039704
Looks fine to me. Seems like it might be useful (and easy) to have
different messages for each case, but not a big deal.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-93980637
[Test build #30481 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30481/consoleFull)
for PR 5551 at commit
[`4335da1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-93980649
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-93966845
[Test build #30481 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30481/consoleFull)
for PR 5551 at commit
[`4335da1`](https://githu
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-93965972
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-93960415
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-93960402
[Test build #30471 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30471/consoleFull)
for PR 5551 at commit
[`4335da1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-93947423
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-93947414
[Test build #30466 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30466/consoleFull)
for PR 5551 at commit
[`77bdcbd`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-93944373
[Test build #30471 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30471/consoleFull)
for PR 5551 at commit
[`4335da1`](https://githu
Github user jerryshao commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#discussion_r28577855
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala ---
@@ -103,9 +103,14 @@ private[spark] class ClientArguments(args:
Array[
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#discussion_r28577520
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala ---
@@ -103,9 +103,14 @@ private[spark] class ClientArguments(args:
Array[Str
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551#issuecomment-93928521
[Test build #30466 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/30466/consoleFull)
for PR 5551 at commit
[`77bdcbd`](https://githu
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5551
[SPARK-6975][Yarn] Fix argument validation error
`numExecutors` checking is failed when dynamic allocation is enabled with
default configuration. Details can be seen is
[SPARK-6975](https://issue
16 matches
Mail list logo