Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168148715
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168148675
**[Test build #48545 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48545/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168148714
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168148942
I've merged it. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168115773
**[Test build #48529 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48529/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168134901
**[Test build #48545 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48545/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168126541
Ah this no longer merges cleanly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168091225
> re: AkkaUtilsSuite, it should be rewritten to only cover the ActorSystem
parts of the code (not any of the RPC stuff), or removed altogether.
Removed
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168093023
**[Test build #48513 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48513/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#discussion_r48635379
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SimrSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -18,9 +18,9 @@
package
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#discussion_r48635701
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AkkaUtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -61,9 +55,14 @@ class AkkaUtilsSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168083178
re: `AkkaUtilsSuite`, it should be rewritten to only cover the
`ActorSystem` parts of the code (not any of the RPC stuff), or removed
altogether. Hopefully we can also
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#discussion_r48635104
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala ---
@@ -544,7 +544,8 @@ private[spark] object SparkConf extends Logging {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168103264
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168103242
**[Test build #48513 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48513/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168103265
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168103376
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168107375
**[Test build #48529 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48529/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168115808
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-168115809
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167914770
CC @vanzin @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167654637
**[Test build #48372 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48372/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#discussion_r48505487
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AkkaUtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -61,9 +55,14 @@ class AkkaUtilsSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#discussion_r48505634
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/util/AkkaUtilsSuite.scala ---
@@ -61,9 +55,14 @@ class AkkaUtilsSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167677241
**[Test build #48372 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48372/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167677319
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167677321
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#discussion_r48402964
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -171,7 +171,19 @@ object MimaExcludes {
) ++
// SPARK-11314: YARN backend moved to yarn
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167069410
And please also point out if there are any tricky changes that should be
paid more attention (I'm guessing none since it's mostly just removal of code?)
---
If your
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167069342
Can you update the pull request and JIRA description to explain what
systemName is, why it still exists, and why it is no longer useful now?
---
If your project is set
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167012366
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167012620
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167012329
**[Test build #48264 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48264/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167012368
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167013686
**[Test build #48268 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48268/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167016412
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167016380
**[Test build #48265 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48265/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167016413
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167024785
**[Test build #48268 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48268/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167024834
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167024832
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167004663
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167004641
**[Test build #48259 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48259/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167004661
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167006863
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167008339
**[Test build #48265 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48265/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459
[SPARK-7995][SPARK-6280][Core]Remove AkkaRpcEnv and remove systemName from
setupEndpointRef
Keep `SparkEnv.actorSystem` because Streaming still uses it. Will remove it
and AkkaUtils after
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167007565
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167006862
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167003325
**[Test build #48259 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48259/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10459#issuecomment-167006026
**[Test build #48264 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48264/consoleFull)**
for PR 10459 at commit
52 matches
Mail list logo
