Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113561900
[Test build #35278 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35278/consoleFull)
for PR 6905 at commit
[`c3dd8d9`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113561167
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113561106
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113559362
Thanks. I didn't notice there is R^2 that is needed to maximize. The
simplest solution should be to invert the result of RMSE, MSE, MAE.
---
If your project is set up fo
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113542976
You would at least have to change the docs in `Evaluator` to say that
`evaluate` no longer necessarily returns larger values for better evaluations.
I don't see
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113542448
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113542306
[Test build #35266 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35266/console)
for PR 6905 at commit
[`b5f52c1`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113523853
[Test build #35266 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35266/consoleFull)
for PR 6905 at commit
[`b5f52c1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113522885
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905#issuecomment-113522827
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6905
[SPARK-8468][ML] Add param to CrossValidator for choosing whether to
maximize evaulation value
JIRA: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-8468
You can merge this pull request into a Git repos
11 matches
Mail list logo