Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-144794054
Shall we close this PR? it sounds like it's not obviously better to reduce
the default.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-144804153
Please keep SPARK-10787 open.
Users may bump into OOME due to the limitation of ObjectOutputStream
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user tedyu closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-143360758
What if we write our own version of ObjectOutputStream with weak references
instead of using strong references ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user jayluan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-143379925
Jira ticket created at
[SPARK-10821](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10821)
Toy test case to recreate the problem as follows. I can't seem to attach
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#discussion_r40288500
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/JavaSerializer.scala ---
@@ -138,7 +142,7 @@ private[spark] class JavaSerializerInstance(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142828118
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142828119
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#discussion_r40306708
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/JavaSerializer.scala ---
@@ -138,7 +142,7 @@ private[spark] class JavaSerializerInstance(
*/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142893455
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142893578
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142898742
[Test build #42969 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42969/consoleFull)
for PR 8896 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#discussion_r40294658
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/JavaSerializer.scala ---
@@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ private[spark] class JavaSerializationStream(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#discussion_r40288294
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/JavaSerializer.scala ---
@@ -45,6 +45,10 @@ private[spark] class JavaSerializationStream(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142828033
[Test build #42956 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42956/console)
for PR 8896 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142939232
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142939229
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142938922
[Test build #42969 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42969/console)
for PR 8896 at commit
Github user jayluan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-143054170
I am still getting this issue with objectStreamReset values of 10, and 1.
Please see my configuration in this thread:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142818546
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142818544
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142818484
[Test build #42952 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42952/console)
for PR 8896 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142795450
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142795432
[Test build #42954 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42954/console)
for PR 8896 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142796117
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142795452
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142796177
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142798087
[Test build #42956 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/42956/consoleFull)
for PR 8896 at commit
Github user tedyu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8896#issuecomment-142801966
The MiMa test failure was due to:
```
[error] (core/*:mimaPreviousClassfiles) sbt.ResolveException: download
failed:
29 matches
Mail list logo
