Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1659
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1659#issuecomment-50635193
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1659#issuecomment-50608076
QA results for PR 1659:- This patch PASSES unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1659#issuecomment-50604084
QA tests have started for PR 1659. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/17444/consoleFull
---
If
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1659
SPARK-2748 [MLLIB] [GRAPHX] Loss of precision for small arguments to
Math.exp, Math.log
In a few places in MLlib, an expression of the form `log(1.0 + p)` is
evaluated. When p is so small that `1.0
