Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-146006529
I mean the title of this PR, to link it
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user tylerprete commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-146004959
@srowen I updated it... seems a bit better.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-146000776
@tylerprete update the title too -- have a look at the contributing link
above.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply app
Github user tylerprete commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145991347
I created a JIRA for this:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-10958
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145987604
I'm pretty sure that I've run into problems when bumping the
jackson-databind version in the past, so we'll have to be careful here.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145985465
The only problem I anticipate here is the different version of Jackson.
Spark is on ~2.4 and I recall that trying to use an app with 2.5+ causes
problems, which leads me
Github user tylerprete commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145983509
# Transitive dependencies
## json4s 3.2.10
![screenshot 2015-10-06 13 03
08](https://cloud.githubusercontent.com/assets/230436/10321006/449ce164-6c2b
Github user tylerprete commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145934402
@JoshRosen I believe there some minor version bumps. I'll run dependency
graph on both a bit later and try to get more exact changes. I assume you're
talking to me ab
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145928134
@srowen, there's definitely a 2.10 version of that artifact published to
Maven: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.json4s/json4s-jackson_2.10/3.3.0
Maybe tr
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145775734
Hm, does 3.3.0 require Scala 2.11? or pull in a different version? there's
a compile problem here. This probably needs an analysis of the diff in the
dependency:tree this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145727432
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145727434
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145727424
[Test build #43269 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43269/console)
for PR 8992 at commit
[`840aac8`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145726925
[Test build #43269 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/43269/consoleFull)
for PR 8992 at commit
[`840aac8`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145726007
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145726049
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145724773
Do you mind filing a JIRA for this change? See
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK and
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SPARK/Contributing+to+Spark.
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145724621
(Whoops, meant to cc @srowen )
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145724524
Are there any changes in this library's transitive dependency graph?
/cc @srown @pwendell for dependency changes / bumps.
---
If your project is set up for it
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145724395
Jenkins, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992#issuecomment-145713116
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
GitHub user tylerprete opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8992
Use json4s 3.3.0. DefaultFormats is now serializable.
Having serializable Formats makes json4s much nicer to work with in
Spark. This seems like a worthwhile upgrade, especially since it's
22 matches
Mail list logo