Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48708268
#332 can't automatic test .
#1208 was messing up and I do not know how to solve . :sweat:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48707227
Wasn't this already decided against in
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/332 and again
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1208 ? or is this not another PR for
https:
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48706567
QA tests have started for PR 1369. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16564/consoleFull
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48701944
QA results for PR 1369:- This patch FAILED unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48696841
QA tests have started for PR 1369. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16556/consoleFull
---
If
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48696680
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48696470
QA results for PR 1369:- This patch FAILED unit tests.- This patch
merges cleanly- This patch adds no public classesFor more
information see test
ouptut:https://amplab.c
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369#issuecomment-48692888
QA tests have started for PR 1369. This patch merges cleanly. View
progress:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/16552/consoleFull
---
If
GitHub user witgo opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1369
Use the scala-logging wrapper instead of the directly sfl4j api
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/witgo/spark SPARK-1470_new
Altern
