Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user gengliangwang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201#discussion_r138409695
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/QueryPlanConstraints.scala
---
@@ -106,91 +106,48 @@ trait QueryPla
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201#discussion_r138401827
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/QueryPlanConstraints.scala
---
@@ -106,91 +106,48 @@ trait QueryPlanCon
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201#discussion_r138384197
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/QueryPlanConstraints.scala
---
@@ -106,91 +106,48 @@ trait QueryPlanCon
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201#discussion_r138393814
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/plans/logical/QueryPlanConstraints.scala
---
@@ -106,91 +106,48 @@ trait QueryPlanCo
GitHub user gengliangwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19201
[SPARK-21979][SQL]Improve QueryPlanConstraints framework
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Improve QueryPlanConstraints framework, make it robust and simple.
In
