Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22427#discussion_r217923482
--- Diff: sql/core/benchmarks/FilterPushdownBenchmark-results.txt ---
@@ -2,737 +2,669 @@
Pushdown for many distinct value case
Github user wangyum commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22427#discussion_r217918733
--- Diff: sql/core/benchmarks/FilterPushdownBenchmark-results.txt ---
@@ -2,737 +2,669 @@
Pushdown for many distinct value case
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22427#discussion_r217916656
--- Diff: sql/core/benchmarks/FilterPushdownBenchmark-results.txt ---
@@ -2,737 +2,669 @@
Pushdown for many distinct value case
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22427
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/22427
[SPARK-25438][SQL][TEST] Fix FilterPushdownBenchmark to use the same memory
assumption
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR aims to fix three things in
