Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-219910742
**[Test build #58737 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58737/consoleFull)**
for PR 13101 at commit
[`f3fa1f5`](https://gi
Github user zjffdu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13160#issuecomment-219910757
Changing sql conf setting seems a better approach. Besides that some other
setting in SparkSession#Build also won't take effect if there's already an
existing SparkConte
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13160#issuecomment-219911211
logging a warning seems like a good idea!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#discussion_r63638222
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/ml/simple_params_example.py ---
@@ -36,18 +35,20 @@
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
--- End diff --
It see
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7025#discussion_r63638336
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/client.R ---
@@ -42,6 +42,19 @@ determineSparkSubmitBin <- function() {
}
sparkSubmitBinName
}
+# R supports both
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#discussion_r63638465
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/ml/simple_params_example.py ---
@@ -36,18 +35,20 @@
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
--- End diff --
Hm.. Is
Github user zhengruifeng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#discussion_r63638842
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/ml/simple_params_example.py ---
@@ -36,18 +35,20 @@
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
--- End diff --
This c
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13162
[SPARK-15375][SQL][Streaming] Add ConsoleSink to structure streaming
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add ConsoleSink to structure streaming, user could use it to displ
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13162#issuecomment-219914340
**[Test build #58738 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58738/consoleFull)**
for PR 13162 at commit
[`235f5d2`](https://gi
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13134#issuecomment-219914749
cc @davies Please take a look, thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146#issuecomment-219914744
**[Test build #58732 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58732/consoleFull)**
for PR 13146 at commit
[`305125d`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146#issuecomment-219914888
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146#issuecomment-219914887
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-219915297
**[Test build #58737 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58737/consoleFull)**
for PR 13101 at commit
[`f3fa1f5`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-219915350
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-219915352
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#discussion_r63640687
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/ml/simple_params_example.py ---
@@ -36,18 +35,20 @@
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
--- End diff --
I see..
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#discussion_r63640828
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/ml/simple_params_example.py ---
@@ -36,18 +35,20 @@
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
--- End diff --
@yanbol
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13127#issuecomment-219918225
**[Test build #58739 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58739/consoleFull)**
for PR 13127 at commit
[`3d694df`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13127#issuecomment-219918389
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13127#issuecomment-219918386
**[Test build #58739 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58739/consoleFull)**
for PR 13127 at commit
[`3d694df`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13127#issuecomment-219918387
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-219918792
**[Test build #58740 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58740/consoleFull)**
for PR 13156 at commit
[`4ac3b76`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-219920209
**[Test build #58741 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58741/consoleFull)**
for PR 13008 at commit
[`57efddb`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#issuecomment-219920955
**[Test build #58735 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58735/consoleFull)**
for PR 13161 at commit
[`7d29dc3`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#issuecomment-219921049
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#issuecomment-219921050
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#discussion_r63643069
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -252,7 +250,7 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0") (@Sinc
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#discussion_r63643173
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreDataSourcesSuite.scala
---
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ class MetastoreDataSourcesSuite extends Q
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#issuecomment-219922114
@HyukjinKwon ah right, of course. I forgot the params get set during `fit`
in Python.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#issuecomment-219922177
**[Test build #58742 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58742/consoleFull)**
for PR 13129 at commit
[`374e610`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#issuecomment-21990
**[Test build #58736 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58736/consoleFull)**
for PR 13161 at commit
[`77d7b17`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#issuecomment-219922326
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#discussion_r63643565
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/ml/simple_params_example.py ---
@@ -36,18 +35,20 @@
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
--- End diff --
We're moving
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13161#issuecomment-219922327
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13162#issuecomment-219922548
**[Test build #58738 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58738/consoleFull)**
for PR 13162 at commit
[`235f5d2`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13162#issuecomment-219922683
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13162#issuecomment-219922682
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#discussion_r63644169
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/MetastoreDataSourcesSuite.scala
---
@@ -622,7 +622,7 @@ class MetastoreDataSourcesSuite exten
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13148#issuecomment-219923723
**[Test build #58743 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58743/consoleFull)**
for PR 13148 at commit
[`c0f3bf7`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#issuecomment-219924209
**[Test build #58744 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58744/consoleFull)**
for PR 13129 at commit
[`d38b1eb`](https://gi
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12836#issuecomment-219925061
I mean is it too simple to allow grouping by columns only - what if after
grouped by columns the dataset is too large to fit in memory?
What if we are to support
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#discussion_r63644923
--- Diff: examples/src/main/python/ml/simple_params_example.py ---
@@ -36,18 +35,20 @@
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
--- End diff --
Thank y
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#issuecomment-219925856
**[Test build #58745 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58745/consoleFull)**
for PR 13135 at commit
[`bb88635`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#issuecomment-219926031
**[Test build #58742 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58742/consoleFull)**
for PR 13129 at commit
[`374e610`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#issuecomment-219926097
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#issuecomment-219926099
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#issuecomment-219926703
**[Test build #58745 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58745/consoleFull)**
for PR 13135 at commit
[`bb88635`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#issuecomment-219926748
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#issuecomment-219926751
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user dilipbiswal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13102#issuecomment-219927191
cc @rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13102#issuecomment-219927672
Sorry this is not what I meant in the JIRA ticket. What I meant was that we
should just save SparkSessions, and then SQLContext calls into that. I didn't
mean to literall
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13148#issuecomment-219927963
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13148#issuecomment-219927902
**[Test build #58743 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58743/consoleFull)**
for PR 13148 at commit
[`c0f3bf7`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13148#issuecomment-219927964
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#discussion_r63646713
--- Diff:
sql/hivecontext-compatibility/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveContextCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -99,4 +105,41 @@ class HiveCon
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#issuecomment-219928428
**[Test build #58744 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58744/consoleFull)**
for PR 13129 at commit
[`d38b1eb`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#issuecomment-219928499
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#issuecomment-219928497
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-219929172
**[Test build #58741 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58741/consoleFull)**
for PR 13008 at commit
[`57efddb`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-219929253
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13008#issuecomment-219929255
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#discussion_r63647706
--- Diff:
sql/hivecontext-compatibility/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveContextCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -99,4 +105,41 @@ class HiveCo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#issuecomment-219930465
**[Test build #58746 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58746/consoleFull)**
for PR 12979 at commit
[`4cb5ed3`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-219931325
**[Test build #58740 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58740/consoleFull)**
for PR 13156 at commit
[`4ac3b76`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-219931474
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13156#issuecomment-219931477
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939#issuecomment-219931480
Lots of punctuation characters like `*`, `+` can be used as an operator in
expressions so I'm afraid comments in generated code will be difficult to read
if characters
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13158#issuecomment-219931535
cc @andrewor14 @zsxwing
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939#issuecomment-219931861
We can just expand the whitelist and add * + and such into that can't we?
My main worry is that security is very difficult to get right, and having a
whitelist substantial
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12979#issuecomment-219932274
@sarutak It's expected to compile twice on two different queries, it does
not worth to optimize this corner case (ideally it should generate different
source code even w
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939#issuecomment-219932692
O.K. Initially we add some characters to the whitelist and if we need some
more characters, we'll consider whether it should be add or not at any time.
How about this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13127#issuecomment-219933026
**[Test build #58747 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58747/consoleFull)**
for PR 13127 at commit
[`14ade4a`](https://gi
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939#issuecomment-219933074
@rxin If there is any new bug found on this, we could switch to white list,
otherwise I'd like to have the current solution.
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939#issuecomment-219933348
@davies this is the 2nd security bug with codegen we found already.
@sarutak sgtm.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have you
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939#issuecomment-219934463
@sarutak That's true. Should `/` also be common used?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13127#issuecomment-219935041
**[Test build #58748 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58748/consoleFull)**
for PR 13127 at commit
[`4494c43`](https://gi
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939#issuecomment-219935334
Either way works for me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#issuecomment-219936663
**[Test build #2990 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2990/consoleFull)**
for PR 13155 at commit
[`76d9f45`](https://g
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12767#issuecomment-219936689
Merged to master/branch-2.0. Thanks @vectorijk @holdenk @sethah for the
review!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12767
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12767#issuecomment-219937205
@taku-k please provide your JIRA username so I can assign the ticket to you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r63651907
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1648,16 +1648,56 @@ object RewriteCorrelatedScalarS
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r63651882
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1648,16 +1648,56 @@ object RewriteCorrelatedScalarS
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13155#discussion_r63651943
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -1648,16 +1648,56 @@ object RewriteCorrelatedScalarS
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10125#issuecomment-219938017
**[Test build #58749 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58749/consoleFull)**
for PR 10125 at commit
[`9aa8c25`](https://gi
Github user ueshin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#issuecomment-219938062
@marmbrus Thank you for your comments.
I see but apparently we are lacking the `planLater` functionality for extra
strategies.
Could you give me the earlier proto
Github user taku-k commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12767#issuecomment-219938151
@MLnick Thanks! My JIRA username is `taku-k`. It's the same as the github
username.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user sarutak commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939#issuecomment-219938986
`/` is used as the division operator and `*` is used as the multiplication
operator so it's good to add those characters but we should `*/` so we need to
add `\*(?!/)`
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13127#issuecomment-219940202
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13127#issuecomment-219940081
**[Test build #58747 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58747/consoleFull)**
for PR 13127 at commit
[`14ade4a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13127#issuecomment-219940203
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user tejasapatil commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12194#issuecomment-219941867
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
501 - 593 of 593 matches
Mail list logo
