Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15935
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975#discussion_r89956606
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCOptions.scala
---
@@ -76,9 +76,6 @@ class JDBCOptions(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975#discussion_r89956633
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JdbcUtils.scala
---
@@ -667,13 +667,13 @@ object JdbcUtils extends Logg
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975#discussion_r89956695
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/jdbc/JDBCSuite.scala
---
@@ -209,6 +209,14 @@ class JDBCSuite extends SparkFunSuite
conn.c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69307/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69309/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16045
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16017
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69306/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69305/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16017
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69303/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69295/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16045
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69304/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15954
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69308/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user gatorsmile opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16055
[SPARK-17897] [SQL] Attribute is not NullIntolerant
### What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`Attribute` is not `NullIntolerant`. This PR is to fix it.
Without the fix,
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wis
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16055
Can you explain how did nullintolerant impact the case?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16017
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
**[Test build #69312 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69312/consoleFull)**
for PR 16030 at commit
[`43f028d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16055
**[Test build #69310 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69310/consoleFull)**
for PR 16055 at commit
[`33c10a0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
**[Test build #69311 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69311/consoleFull)**
for PR 16048 at commit
[`fa313e5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16055
Sure, will update the PR description tomorrow. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16017
**[Test build #69313 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69313/consoleFull)**
for PR 16017 at commit
[`30f5096`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16014
@shivaram Cool, I did know about release-build but I didn't know it's
running on Jenkins. I *think* we should be ok but might want to check Jenkins
has "e1071" and "survival" which are optional
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #69314 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69314/consoleFull)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`74cb363`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16014
**[Test build #69315 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69315/consoleFull)**
for PR 16014 at commit
[`c9c9802`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009
**[Test build #69316 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69316/consoleFull)**
for PR 16009 at commit
[`019e5af`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009#discussion_r89961315
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/ChiSqSelector.scala ---
@@ -49,15 +49,13 @@ private[feature] trait ChiSqSelectorParams extends
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009#discussion_r89961575
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizer.scala ---
@@ -70,17 +70,16 @@ private[feature] trait QuantileDiscretizerBas
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16045
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16044#discussion_r89962468
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/JoinSuite.scala ---
@@ -575,6 +575,24 @@ class JoinSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQLContext {
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16045
**[Test build #69317 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69317/consoleFull)**
for PR 16045 at commit
[`9689763`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16017
**[Test build #69313 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69313/consoleFull)**
for PR 16017 at commit
[`30f5096`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16017
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69313/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16017
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16054
It seems like you didn't read http://spark.apache.org/contributing.html --
it's even left in the message you didn't delete above. This isn't how changes
are proposed. Twitter integration moved to Bah
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16002
Yes, echoing @sethah, can I ask what the problem being solved is? I
understand being careful with what exactly is thrown from _public_ methods
because they end up forming part of the API, but this se
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16029
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69314/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #69314 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69314/consoleFull)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`74cb363`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
**[Test build #69312 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69312/consoleFull)**
for PR 16030 at commit
[`43f028d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69312/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
Merged to master/2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16013
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009
**[Test build #69316 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69316/consoleFull)**
for PR 16009 at commit
[`019e5af`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16009
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69316/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
**[Test build #69318 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69318/consoleFull)**
for PR 16028 at commit
[`bad1735`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
GitHub user ueshin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16056
[SPARK-18623][SQL] Add `returnNullable` to `StaticInvoke` and modify it to
handle properly.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add `returnNullable` to `StaticInvoke` the sa
Github user Aegeaner closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16054
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16055
**[Test build #69310 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69310/consoleFull)**
for PR 16055 at commit
[`33c10a0`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16055
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69310/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16055
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16056
**[Test build #69319 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69319/consoleFull)**
for PR 16056 at commit
[`ab9d6fc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15837
IMHO, it would be good to stop applying subexpression elimination to a very
simple expression (e.g. `Literal(1))`). This is because it takes some cost
(e.g. executing a conditional branch) for this su
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15736
If that's true then again doesn't my suggestion to inline
`partitionComparator` fix it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
GitHub user jiangxb1987 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057
[SPARK-18624][SQL] Implicit cast complex types
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently `ImplicitTypeCasts` doesn't handle casts between `ArrayType`s,
this is not
GitHub user yanboliang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16058
[SPARK-18291][SparkR][ML][FOLLOW-UP] Encode probability to prediction by
SQLTransformer.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is follow-up for #15788, ```spark.glm``` can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16058
**[Test build #69320 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69320/consoleFull)**
for PR 16058 at commit
[`7644e97`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16057
**[Test build #69321 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69321/consoleFull)**
for PR 16057 at commit
[`374b4f8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user yanboliang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16058
cc @jkbradley @felixcheung
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user jiangxb1987 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14619
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature i
Github user kiszk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15467
ping @ericl
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16030
I'm looking into the failures.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user uncleGen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052#discussion_r89983105
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/serializer/SerializerManager.scala ---
@@ -155,7 +155,12 @@ private[spark] class
SerializerManager(defaultSe
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046#discussion_r89984727
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1011,24 +1011,24 @@ class Analyzer(
private
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046#discussion_r89975192
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1110,6 +1157,12 @@ class Analyzer(
} e
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046#discussion_r89977826
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1120,47 +1173,54 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046#discussion_r89978030
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1120,47 +1173,54 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046#discussion_r89974976
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1077,10 +1077,54 @@ class Analyzer(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046#discussion_r89980037
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1120,47 +1173,54 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16046#discussion_r89979376
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1120,47 +1173,54 @@ class Analyzer(
}
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15255
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69318/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16028
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15975#discussion_r89986253
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/jdbc/JDBCOptions.scala
---
@@ -76,9 +76,6 @@ class JDBCOptions(
Github user hvanhovell commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16047
LGTM - merging to 2.0. Thanks!
Can you close?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
GitHub user zhengruifeng opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16059
[SPARK-18625][ML] OneVsRestModel should support setFeaturesCol and
setPredictionCol
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
add `setFeaturesCol` and `setPredictionCol` for `One
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16014
**[Test build #69315 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69315/consoleFull)**
for PR 16014 at commit
[`c9c9802`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16014
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69315/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16052
**[Test build #69323 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69323/consoleFull)**
for PR 16052 at commit
[`cd7e595`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16014
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16059
**[Test build #69322 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69322/consoleFull)**
for PR 16059 at commit
[`4a6ecab`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16059
Is this not the same as https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15957 but for
a different class?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
**[Test build #69311 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69311/consoleFull)**
for PR 16048 at commit
[`fa313e5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16048
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69311/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
**[Test build #69324 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/69324/consoleFull)**
for PR 15620 at commit
[`6a7e9ac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user kapilsingh5050 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15620
The unit tests passed after incorporating related changes from SPARK-15327
and SPARK-17115
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on Git
Github user witgo commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
@kayousterhout
Here are my thoughts:
move the serialization out of the `TaskSetManager.resourceOffer` method.
Split resourceOffer and serialization process, So that we can make the
seria
1 - 100 of 671 matches
Mail list logo
