Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16827
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72486/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16827
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
> Should we roll these behaviors into one flag? e.g.
```spark.sql.hive.mixedCaseSchemaSupport```
That sounds reasonable to me. The only thing I wonder about is if there's
any use case where
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72479 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72479/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r99725005
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -243,27 +245,42 @@ class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505#discussion_r99724943
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskDescription.scala ---
@@ -66,7 +100,8 @@ private[spark] object TaskDescription {
Github user mridulm commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16620
@kayousterhout That sounds more clear, and I can see this being a problem
(and probably explains some hung jobs I had seen a while earlier), thanks !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
**[Test build #72474 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72474/testReport)**
for PR 16783 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
**[Test build #72480 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72480/testReport)**
for PR 16744 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
**[Test build #72482 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72482/testReport)**
for PR 16171 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72473/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
**[Test build #72473 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72473/testReport)**
for PR 16795 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72480/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.1.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
**[Test build #72487 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72487/testReport)**
for PR 16740 at commit
Github user actuaryzhang commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
@sethah Thanks for the comments.
OK, added more tests to cover all families. It's not possible to test all
family and link combination if that's what you mean: the tweedie family
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99748834
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/UnsupportedOperationChecker.scala
---
@@ -46,8 +46,13 @@ object
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99748711
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/statefulOperators.scala
---
@@ -235,3 +234,79 @@ case class StateStoreSaveExec(
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762#discussion_r99748730
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/joins/BroadcastNestedLoopJoinExec.scala
---
@@ -339,6 +340,33 @@ case class
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99748668
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/state/StateStore.scala
---
@@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ trait StateStore {
*/
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16828
cc @gatorsmile @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824#discussion_r99729087
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/session.py ---
@@ -51,8 +51,10 @@ def toDF(self, schema=None, sampleRatio=None):
:param samplingRatio: the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72478 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72478/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16814
Btw, do you have a need to backport this to previous releases? Or is
master sufficient?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
is CROSS JOIN a logical or physical concept?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99748260
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/MapGroupsWithStateSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
GitHub user windpiger opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16828
[SPARK-19484][SQL]continue work to create hive table with an empty schema
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
after
Github user budde commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744#discussion_r99718545
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/examples/streaming/KinesisExampleUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
**[Test build #72476 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72476/testReport)**
for PR 16737 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824#discussion_r99728558
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -296,8 +312,10 @@ def show(self, n=20, truncate=True):
If set to a number greater than
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
how about we add a new SQL command to refresh the table schema in metastore
by inferring schema with data files? This is a compatibility issue and we
should have provided a way for users to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72482/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16171
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user uncleGen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16827
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16827
**[Test build #72486 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72486/testReport)**
for PR 16827 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16747
Then, It looks okay to me as describing the current state and I just
checked it after building the doc with this, and also
we can already use it as below:
```scala
scala>
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99747470
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/MapGroupsWithStateSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99747455
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/MapGroupsWithStateSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,240 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99748491
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyedState.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758#discussion_r99748496
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/KeyedState.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,134 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF)
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r99753353
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -20,8 +20,12 @@ package
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800#discussion_r99755781
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/generics.R ---
@@ -1376,6 +1376,10 @@ setGeneric("spark.kstest", function(data, ...) {
standardGeneric("spark.kstest")
#'
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800
**[Test build #72492 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72492/testReport)**
for PR 16800 at commit
Github user windpiger commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16809
thanks a lot! It seems that add a REFRESH command is to not modify the
default behavior. if user want to refresh, they call the command manually.
@gatorsmile @sameeragarwal @hvanhovell
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16750#discussion_r99760937
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameReader.scala ---
@@ -298,6 +299,8 @@ class DataFrameReader private[sql](sparkSession:
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16750#discussion_r99760946
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/json/JSONOptions.scala
---
@@ -31,10 +31,11 @@ import
Github user tanejagagan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16497#discussion_r99753046
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/Percentile.scala
---
@@ -125,10 +139,17 @@ case class
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16497
**[Test build #72491 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72491/testReport)**
for PR 16497 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16376
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16376
Awesome always enthusiastic about fixing minor nits!! I merged this into
master. I didn't merge it into 2.1 but I don't feel strongly about it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
**[Test build #72487 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72487/testReport)**
for PR 16740 at commit
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
> how about we add a new SQL command to refresh the table schema in
metastore by inferring schema with data files? This is a compatibility issue
and we should have provided a way for users to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16828
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user budde commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16797
> BTW, what behavior do we expect if a parquet file has two columns whose
lower-cased names are identical?
I can take a look at how Spark handled this prior to 2.1, although I'm not
sure if
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758
I addressed all the comments. However, @zsxwing, our offline discussion of
throwing error on `.update(null)` ran into a problem. Since its typed as S, the
behavior is odd when S is primitive type. See
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16758
**[Test build #72490 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72490/testReport)**
for PR 16758 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800#discussion_r99755967
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_mllib_classification.R ---
@@ -27,6 +27,44 @@ absoluteSparkPath <- function(x) {
file.path(sparkHome, x)
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16800#discussion_r99755912
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/r/LinearSVCWrapper.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,149 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72487/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16828
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72488/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16828
**[Test build #72488 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72488/testReport)**
for PR 16828 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16762
cc @srinathshankar @sameeragarwal @hvanhovell @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72463/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16795
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16783
**[Test build #72474 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72474/testReport)**
for PR 16783 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15009
**[Test build #72475 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72475/testReport)**
for PR 15009 at commit
GitHub user kunalkhamar opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Fork SparkSession with option to inherit a copy of the SessionState.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Forking a newSession() from SparkSession currently makes a new
Github user imatiach-msft commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
@actuaryzhang the changes look good to me. I had some nit-picks which you
marked as won't fix, and I'm ok with that. Thank you for fixing this issue!
Maybe a committer can review this -
Github user kunalkhamar commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Hey @zsxwing
Can you take another look and let me know if anything needs changes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16826
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16824#discussion_r99711908
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1191,6 +1287,12 @@ def dropna(self, how='any', thresh=None,
subset=None):
This
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744#discussion_r99711844
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisTestUtils.scala
---
@@ -205,6 +205,8 @@ private[kinesis] object
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16737
**[Test build #72476 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72476/testReport)**
for PR 16737 at commit
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16740
Regarding the tests - I don't think the tests should change _depending on_
the implementation. I don't think it's valid to say that we don't need to test
this thoroughly because we know that it's
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16744#discussion_r99713106
--- Diff:
external/kinesis-asl/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kinesis/KinesisReceiver.scala
---
@@ -35,10 +36,65 @@ import
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99716361
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -69,19 +72,29 @@ private[spark] class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99717574
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -69,19 +72,29 @@ private[spark] class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99717754
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -201,6 +202,49 @@ class PoolSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99717324
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -69,19 +72,29 @@ private[spark] class
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16813#discussion_r99712707
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -28,19 +29,19 @@ import org.apache.spark.scheduler.SchedulingMode._
Github user valek commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16818
> Just make sure we can construct a range frame that respects longs, and
throw an error for row frames.
This seems totally reasonable
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72436/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16810
**[Test build #72437 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72437/testReport)**
for PR 16810 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16269
**[Test build #72444 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72444/testReport)**
for PR 16269 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
**[Test build #72436 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72436/testReport)**
for PR 16815 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16815
**[Test build #72435 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72435/testReport)**
for PR 16815 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16820
**[Test build #72451 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72451/testReport)**
for PR 16820 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72452 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72452/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99595765
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -600,6 +603,16 @@ class
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99596922
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTrackerSuite.scala ---
@@ -456,4 +461,69 @@ class BlacklistTrackerSuite extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16650#discussion_r99596040
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite.scala
---
@@ -467,6 +469,51 @@ class StandaloneDynamicAllocationSuite
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16787
**[Test build #72455 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72455/testReport)**
for PR 16787 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16821
**[Test build #72454 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/72454/testReport)**
for PR 16821 at commit
201 - 300 of 557 matches
Mail list logo
