Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
**[Test build #87283 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87283/testReport)**
for PR 20566 at commit
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559#discussion_r167394720
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/tests.py ---
@@ -2867,6 +2867,35 @@ def
test_create_dataframe_required_pandas_not_found(self):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87285/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559#discussion_r167394718
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/types.py ---
@@ -1766,15 +1781,13 @@ def _check_series_convert_timestamps_localize(s,
from_timezone, to_timezone):
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
**[Test build #87285 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87285/testReport)**
for PR 20566 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/772/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
**[Test build #87286 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87286/testReport)**
for PR 20559 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20531
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20561
**[Test build #87279 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87279/testReport)**
for PR 20561 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20407#discussion_r167392509
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -156,6 +156,15 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20564#discussion_r167392786
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -598,8 +598,22 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20397
I am careful to say this out .. but let me leave my +0 for
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20397#issuecomment-361345426. One option
might be a similar name with `DataWriterFactory` but
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20397#discussion_r167392663
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/RateSourceV2Suite.scala
---
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ class RateSourceV2Suite
GitHub user viirya opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
[SPARK-23377][ML] Fixes Bucketizer with multiple columns persistence bug
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since 2.3, `Bucketizer` supports multiple input/output columns.
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20567
[SPARK-23380][PYTHON] Make toPandas fall back to Arrow optimization
disabled when schema is not supported in Arrow optimization
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20567#discussion_r167394424
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1955,38 +1967,34 @@ def toPandas(self):
return
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20567
**[Test build #87284 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87284/testReport)**
for PR 20567 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
@mgaido91 I also considered the issue of changed default values across
versions. I'm not sure which is more reasonable, using old version's default
value or using current version's default value.
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566#discussion_r167394422
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -864,6 +864,11 @@ trait Params extends Identifiable with Serializable {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/771/
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20567
cc @ueshin, @BryanCutler and @icexelloss, could you take a look please when
you have some time?
---
-
To unsubscribe,
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
**[Test build #87285 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87285/testReport)**
for PR 20566 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20567
Seems it happened to fix this case too:
```python
spark.conf.set("spark.sql.execution.arrow.enabled", "false")
df = spark.createDataFrame([[bytearray("a")]])
df.toPandas()
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
@viirya that's a good question. Honestly my idea is that if the user
doesn't set a value, he/she doesn't care about it, so it is good to use the new
version default IMHO. But it is also true that
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
**[Test build #87287 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87287/testReport)**
for PR 20559 at commit
Github user mafernandez-stratio commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17185
@gatorsmile Great, thanks for the feedback!
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20531
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20531
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/767/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20531
**[Test build #87281 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87281/testReport)**
for PR 20531 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/769/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20567
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20567
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/770/
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566#discussion_r167394494
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -864,6 +864,11 @@ trait Params extends Identifiable with Serializable {
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
Yeah, IMHO, when the user loads a model from old version into new version
to run, I think it is reasonable to run it with current default value because
the param is not explicitly set and should use
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20567
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20567
**[Test build #87284 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87284/testReport)**
for PR 20567 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20567
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87284/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87286/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
**[Test build #87286 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87286/testReport)**
for PR 20559 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/773/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20561
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20531
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87280/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20561
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87279/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20531
**[Test build #87280 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87280/testReport)**
for PR 20531 at commit
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20564#discussion_r167392724
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -1107,11 +1107,6 @@ private[spark] class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20407#discussion_r167392901
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -156,6 +156,15 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20397#discussion_r167393259
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/sources/RateStreamSourceV2.scala
---
@@ -139,15 +139,15 @@ class
Github user mgaido91 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20407
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20531
retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
**[Test build #87283 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87283/testReport)**
for PR 20566 at commit
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20472#discussion_r167393891
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -931,7 +925,8 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends Logging {
Github user mgaido91 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566#discussion_r167394216
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -864,6 +864,11 @@ trait Params extends Identifiable with Serializable {
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20567#discussion_r167394432
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/dataframe.py ---
@@ -1941,12 +1941,24 @@ def toPandas(self):
timezone = None
if
Github user akonopko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19431#discussion_r167395487
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka010/DirectKafkaStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -687,6 +618,51 @@ class
Github user akonopko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19431#discussion_r167395482
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-8/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -539,6 +456,58 @@ class
Github user akonopko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19431#discussion_r167395492
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-8/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka/DirectKafkaStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ import java.io.File
Github user akonopko commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/19431#discussion_r167395493
--- Diff:
external/kafka-0-10/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/kafka010/DirectKafkaStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ import java.lang.{
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20568
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20568
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
GitHub user MohammedLayeeq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20569
Branch 2.2
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how this
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20560
**[Test build #87288 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87288/testReport)**
for PR 20560 at commit
GitHub user mrkm4ntr opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20568
[SPARK-23381][CORE] Murmur3 hash generates a different value from other
implementations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Murmur3 hash generates a different value from the
Github user MohammedLayeeq closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20569
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20560
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20560
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87288/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20560
@mgaido91 Yeah, we definitely should include this rule. We just need more
careful review and comprehensive test cases. Thanks for your work!
---
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20560
thank you @gatorsmile for taking a look at this. Let me know if there is
something I can/should improve. Thanks.
---
-
To
Github user bersprockets commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20519
>yea but we can't simply flush and ignore the stdout specifically from
sitecustomize unless we define a kind of an additional protocol like this
because we can't simply distinguish if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20531
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20531
**[Test build #87281 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87281/testReport)**
for PR 20531 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20561
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20561
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87282/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20531
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87281/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user mgaido91 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20560
@gatorsmile thanks for your comment. I moved it to a separate rule and
added more tests.
As per the added value of this rule, I see 3 main points:
1. Let's imagine that a user exposes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
**[Test build #87289 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87289/testReport)**
for PR 20566 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
**[Test build #87287 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87287/testReport)**
for PR 20559 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20559
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87287/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20561
**[Test build #87282 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87282/testReport)**
for PR 20561 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20560
**[Test build #87288 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87288/testReport)**
for PR 20560 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20560
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/774/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20560
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566#discussion_r167398469
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/param/params.scala ---
@@ -864,6 +864,11 @@ trait Params extends Identifiable with Serializable {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/testing-k8s-prb-make-spark-distribution/775/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20566
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20561
lgtm
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20537
**[Test build #87290 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87290/testReport)**
for PR 20537 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20537
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20537
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87290/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20520
Merged to master
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20537
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20537
**[Test build #87290 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/87290/testReport)**
for PR 20537 at commit
101 - 200 of 211 matches
Mail list logo