Re: Where to file bugs?

2011-04-09 Thread Rexxe
Cool, thanks, I may have found another one. On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Russell Brown wrote: > > On 9 Apr 2011, at 08:22, Rexxe wrote: > > > I found a bug in Riak, where do I file it? > > https://issues.basho.com > > > > > The bug is that if you use the tokenize key filter and pass in an ind

Re: Where to file bugs?

2011-04-09 Thread Rexxe
The other bug I found has already been filed under bug # 1003. On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Rexxe wrote: > Cool, thanks, I may have found another one. > > On Fri, Apr 8, 2011 at 11:48 PM, Russell Brown wrote: > >> >> On 9 Apr 2011, at 08:22, Rexxe wrote: >> >> > I found a bug in Riak, where

Re: C++ Riak client?

2011-04-09 Thread Sean Cribbs
I didn't permanently abandon it, but it was much more fiddly than doing the same thing in pure Ruby. I have plans to deliver separate "native" Protocol Buffers libraries for MRI and JRuby (at least) in 1.0 of the Ruby client. Because it's being confused in this conversation, I think it merits

Re: C++ Riak client?

2011-04-09 Thread Les Mikesell
On 4/9/11 10:47 AM, Sean Cribbs wrote: Because it's being confused in this conversation, I think it merits clarification -- the "protocol" that is used to talk to Riak and Google's Protocol Buffers are NOT the same thing. Riak uses a simple length- and message-code-prefixed binary protocol, in w

Re: C++ Riak client?

2011-04-09 Thread Sean Cribbs
Assuming you encode your data properly and choose buckets/keys that are URL-safe, there's no reason you can't access it from both interfaces. Sean Cribbs Developer Advocate Basho Technologies, Inc. http://basho.com/ On Apr 9, 2011, at 12:10 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > On 4/9/11 10:47 AM, Sean Cr

Re: C++ Riak client?

2011-04-09 Thread Les Mikesell
Thanks - are there more details about how that should work or examples anywhere? On 4/9/11 11:14 AM, Sean Cribbs wrote: Assuming you encode your data properly and choose buckets/keys that are URL-safe, there's no reason you can't access it from both interfaces. Sean Cribbs Developer Advocate

Re: C++ Riak client?

2011-04-09 Thread Mike Oxford
So you have Google protocol buffers wrapped in a TLV-type (LTV?) format. Good to know, thanks for the clarification! For anyone writing a basic client: http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/cpptutorial.html Substitute with iostreams fed from the network and there you go. -mox On Sa

Re: C++ Riak client?

2011-04-09 Thread Sean Cribbs
Yes, that's correct (LTV). The wiki page should explain this fairly well. Sean Cribbs Developer Advocate Basho Technologies, Inc. http://basho.com/ On Apr 9, 2011, at 12:35 PM, Mike Oxford wrote: > So you have Google protocol buffers wrapped in a TLV-type (LTV?) format. > > Good to know, thank

Re: C++ Riak client?

2011-04-09 Thread David Leimbach
Sent from my iPhone On Apr 9, 2011, at 9:35 AM, Mike Oxford wrote: > So you have Google protocol buffers wrapped in a TLV-type (LTV?) format. > > Good to know, thanks for the clarification! > > For anyone writing a basic client: > http://code.google.com/apis/protocolbuffers/docs/cpptutoria

multi backend in PB client

2011-04-09 Thread Jon Brisbin
Can I set the backend on a bucket via the PB client now? http://lists.basho.com/pipermail/riak-users_lists.basho.com/2011-January/002966.html Thanks! Jon Brisbin http://jbrisbin.com Twitter: @j_brisbin ___ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.ba