Re: ssh tunnel between nodes in a cluster?

Yes, in this case I do! On 5/29/11 10:25 PM, Matt Ranney wrote: > Are you sure you want this? Riak will spread your data across all > nodes in the cluster with no consideration for the network topology. > > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Jeremy Bornstein > wrote: >

Re: ssh tunnel between nodes in a cluster?

Are you sure you want this? Riak will spread your data across all nodes in the cluster with no consideration for the network topology. On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Jeremy Bornstein wrote: > We have machines in different data centers and no VPN between them. I'm > a little confused by the d

ssh tunnel between nodes in a cluster?

Greetings all! I'm a riak newbie, trying to figure out the details of setting up a cluster in my environment. We have machines in different data centers and no VPN between them. I'm a little confused by the details of the required ports, and would love to see a concrete example from someone who

Re: Load Balancing With Riak Ruby Client

I think for the protocol buffers, one should probably use the "least connected" strategy, but PBC connections tend to be more long-lived than HTTP connections -- which would describe what you saw. Sean Cribbs Developer Advocate Basho Technologies, Inc. http://basho.com/ On May 29, 2011, at 1:3

Re: Load Balancing With Riak Ruby Client

Is there are any solution for round robin through HAproxy to Riak using protobufs? I believe Yammer guys are using it in their setup.. Might be wrong, though. On May 29, 2011, at 10:35 AM, "Scott M. Likens" wrote: Hey, In my Chef recipes for AppCloud (Engine Yard's PaaS Product) I actually con

Re: Load Balancing With Riak Ruby Client

Hey, In my Chef recipes for AppCloud (Engine Yard's PaaS Product) I actually configured haproxy to listen on 8098 on the application instances and redirect to all the riak nodes in a roundrobin fashion. (Had httpchk for /ping to ensure the node is up) In my own testing with basho_bench this se

Re: zip mapreduce results

Sounds like a great contrib.basho.com contribution :) On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ben Tilly wrote: > Google uses http://code.google.com/p/snappy/ internally for exactly this > sort of thing. There is an Erlang binding available. > > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Malka Feldman wrote: >

Re: zip mapreduce results

Google uses http://code.google.com/p/snappy/ internally for exactly this sort of thing. There is an Erlang binding available. On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Malka Feldman wrote: > Hi, > I get long strings from my map functions, I want to get much smaller > responses to reduce the latency, Do

Re: Store whole database in memory

Hi Michael, Greg's advice is probably the best, if you really always want to read back or update predefined groups of 1000 keys at once. It will increase the rate at which you can write and read by a factor of 1000 ;-). But if that's not what you want to do, and we really don't know what you

zip mapreduce results

Hi, I get long strings from my map functions, I want to get much smaller responses to reduce the latency, Do you know an option to zip my strings in a redcue phase? Thanks, -- *Malka Feldman* Tribase LTD. 41 Shimon Hatzadik St. Elad, Israel Tel. 074-7122704 Fax. 03-9075211 Cell. 972-54-8370