So if you are getting close to similar numbers with the memory and bitcask
backends, you know that file IO isn't your bottleneck in the load test. My
guess is that the machine you are running the load with (where you are
running basho_bench) can't keep up with the test. I'm running basho_bench
on a
I gave this approach a try on the test cluster and it worked. I disabled
search on all buckets. Then dropped the merge index on each node via the MI
Pid. This freed up the space (it didn't remove all the subfolders in the
merge_index but the disk usage went down to a few hundred K). Then I
reindex
Brian,
First, our documentation is wrong. Sorry. The correct way to add aliases
looks like so:
{field, [
{name, "Name"},
{analyzer_factory, {erlang, text_analyzers,
standard_analyzer_factory}},
{alias, "LastName"},
Hello,
I am trying to make searching on chinese simplified keys work.
I added this document:
{
"介绍": "15岁的女孩与癌"
}
and I search using this url:
http://localhost:8091/solr/test/select?q=%22%E4%BB%8B%E7%BB%8D%22:%2215%E5%B2%81%E7%9A%84%E5%A5%B3%E5%AD%A9%E4%B8%8E%E7%99%8C%22
and
http://local
Hey All,
Thanks to the urging of Deadzen [0], we now have a dedicated mailing
list for Riak Core. You can subscribe here:
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-core_lists.basho.com
For those of you not familiar with Riak Core [1], it's more-or-less
the distributed systems infrastructure t
Sorry, I forgot to add your results, using bitcask:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/183971/summary.png
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Uruka Dark wrote:
> Just an update.
>
> I ran the benchmark again, but now, using Memory backend:
> https://dl.dropbox.com/u/308392/memory_summary.png
>
> This was the
Just an update.
I ran the benchmark again, but now, using Memory backend:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/308392/memory_summary.png
This was the result using Bitcask backend:
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/308392/bitcask_summary.png
The difference is not that big in my environment. I was expecting much
bette
Thx Bryan, found it during the weekend ;)
Regards,
Zabrane
On Nov 5, 2012, at 4:45 PM, Bryan Fink wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Zabrane Mickael wrote:
>> I've this in my makefile:
>>
>> compile:
>>@$(REBAR) compile -Dfoo=17
> ...snip...
>> How can I defined macro with value
Thanks, Gordon!
We are using the Net::Riak perl module, with the PBC transport.
I have not done any work with this module myself (I'm just running Riak for
us).
I'll pass this along.
- Original Message -
From: "Gordon Tillman"
To: "Dave Brady"
Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com
S
David what client are you using to access Riak? We are using the Python client
and the procedure for working with 2i (or anything else) is exactly the same
whether you are using the http transport (riak.RiakHttpTransport) or the pbc
transport (riak.RiakPbcTransport).
--gordon
On Nov 5, 2012,
Hello,
Apologies if this has been answered!
I looked around a bit, and see plenty of references to "querying 2i via PBC",
though nothing that explicitly states that such an index can be created via
PBC. All the examples I saw employ the HTTP interface.
Would someone mind supplying an exampl
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Zabrane Mickael wrote:
> I've this in my makefile:
>
> compile:
> @$(REBAR) compile -Dfoo=17
...snip...
> How can I defined macro with value using rebar?
Hi, Zabrane.
It looks to me like the command line -D option for rebar does not
support defining values
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:03 AM, Igor Karymov wrote:
> Hi all. Does I understand correctly that reading with mapreduce not trigger
> read-repair mechanism?
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 9:45 AM, Igor Karymov wrote:
> And how about link walking? It's same situation because link walking it's
> just specia
13 matches
Mail list logo
