Hi,
Putting varnish in front of Riak CS nodes seems a good idea, if the
load concentrates on small number of videos whose total size fits in
varnish's memory. Yet I'm not sure how varnish works in caching.
Putting varnish between Riak CS and Riak is not a good idea because
they communicates with p
Hi Kota,
one idea that came up was to work with varnish.
You are right, Video Filesize can range from mega to gigybytes. So it would
be usefull, if the cache is self organizing and deleting lesser used files,
when space is needed.
Varnish is a nice solution for that, but it lacks one problem. Th
Currently Riak CS and Riak don't have caching system inside. Because
in the context of Riak CS, file size might range so much, say, from
kilobytes to terabytes and it's hard to build an efficient caching
layer. Also, in the context of Riak, once you read a data from Riak,
it is cached under the ker
I will probably stick with EBS-store for now. I don't know how comfortable
I can get with a replica that could disappear with simply an unintended
reboot (one of my nodes just did that randomly today, for example). Sure, I
would immediately start rebuilding it as soon as that were to happen, but
we
riak-users,
Adding to the existing list of RFCs for the next release of Riak, Andrew
Thompson and I would like to get your feedback on a significant change to
Riak's key structure:
https://github.com/basho/riak/issues/362
This has an effect on third-party client developers, especially, since it
On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 2:38 PM, Dave Martorana wrote:
> Jared - thanks for the links. I'm in the same boat with Brady with weighing
> deployment options in AWS.
>
> Jeremiah - isn't EBS the only option once your data starts reaching into the
> hundreds-of-gigs?
Several instances give you > 1TB o
Nope, depending on how much you want to spend, you can cram up to 42TB into
a single AWS instance. Reasonably priced instances can hold 1690GB of data
on a single instance. You can see an easy to sort map over here:
http://www.ec2instances.info/
I would take Amazon's own recommendations with a gra
Jared - thanks for the links. I'm in the same boat with Brady with weighing
deployment options in AWS.
Jeremiah - isn't EBS the only option once your data starts reaching into
the hundreds-of-gigs?
Dave
On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Jared Morrow wrote:
> +1 to what Jeremiah said, putting a
Hi,
How do I specify the filesystem where the RIAK CS buckets could run. Changing
the data_root values in storage_backend is not working as it is specified in a
FAQ
(http://docs.basho.com/riakcs/latest/cookbooks/faqs/riak-cs/#is-it-possible-to-specify-a-file-system-where-my-r).
Regards,
Dilip
Earlier this year SoftLayer and Basho started collaborating to make Riak
clusters easy to deploy, and later this month SoftLayer will be hosting and
speaking at our first Dallas meetup.
If you've ever been curious about just how blazing fast Riak can be on serious
bare metal, please join us for
Hi Ryan,
sorry for the late reply. We are running 1.3.2 and after deleting the buffer.*
files, riak started. However, running the riak_search_vnode:repair( P )
resulted in plenty of errors like:
[…]
2013-08-08 16:36:08.261 [error] <0.1938.0> Supervisor mi_buffer_converter_sup
had child ignored
11 matches
Mail list logo
