Never mind, installing the dependencies from within R instead of debian
packages resolved my issues.
On Sat, Dec 21, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Georgio Pandarez <
georgiopanda...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Any ideas to troubleshoot graph generation?
>
> My bash_bench looks like it completed ok:
>
>
Hi Guys,
Any ideas to troubleshoot graph generation?
My bash_bench looks like it completed ok:
$ ./basho_bench
examples/riakc_pb.config
10:11:48.959 [debug] Lager installed handler {lager_file_backend,
"/home/accassar/src/basho_bench/tests/20131221_101148/error.log"} into
lager_event
10:11:48.
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Stone"
To: "Jason Campbell"
Cc: "Sean Cribbs" , "riak-users" ,
"Viable Nisei"
Sent: Saturday, 21 December, 2013 10:01:29 AM
Subject: Re: May allow_mult cause DoS?
> Think of an object with thousands of siblings. That's an object that has 1
> copy o
I could be wrong, but I believe there’s metadata overhead for each sibling, so
even if all data in all siblings needs to be retained, it’s still more
efficient to merge and save them as one object.
-John
On Dec 20, 2013, at 6:01 PM, Andrew Stone wrote:
> Think of an object with thousands of s
Think of an object with thousands of siblings. That's an object that has 1
copy of the data for each sibling. That object could be on the order of
100s of megabytes. Everytime an object is read off disk and returned to the
client 100mb is being transferred. Furthermore leveldb must rewrite the
enti
- Original Message -
From: "Sean Cribbs"
To: "Jason Campbell"
Sent: Saturday, 21 December, 2013 3:17:57 AM
Subject: Re: May allow_mult cause DoS?
> No, the behavior in LevelDB is no different than the behavior of any of our
> other backends, namely, all siblings occupy the sam
Riak users,
Riak 1.4.6 was pushed to the apt and yum repositories and is now available for
download from docs.basho.com.
Along with bug fixes, the most notable changes involve 2i. We have reverted to
unsorted key lists by default for better performance, added regular expression
filters for ran
Hi All,
Happy Friday. In just a few moments Reid Draper and I will be discussing
property based testing in general, and specifically how we use Erlang
QuickCheck at Basho.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D06M8NMJYCw
Cheers,
Tom
___
riak-users mailing li
I'd like to get started with Riak 2.0, and would appreciate
insight/feedback on the following:
1. Since a client does not exist for 2.0, I was planning on using Jersey
and Jackson to make http calls to the db. Has anyone tried this and if yes,
how difficult was it? Are there any other cli
I feel the need to point out that with just a key or two you're
probably only talking to 3/5 of the machines. for a single key adding
extra nodes won't make it faster. (As I understand it)
- Peace
Dave
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Russell Brown wrote:
>
> On 20 Dec 2013, at 10:18, Georgio
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:14 PM, Jason Campbell wrote:
> Can anyone familiar with Riak internals describe how siblings are handled
> in Level DB? I think part of this issue is a misunderstanding of how that
> works and false expectations.
>
> As far as I understand, siblings are light at write t
On 20 Dec 2013, at 10:18, Georgio Pandarez wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> Thanks for the prompt response.
>
> > Also realised I never asked, what version of Riak are you running
>
> 1.4.2
>
> > It doesn’t look like Riak is doing a whole lot at this point
>
> So is it normal for the cpu to spin?
Thanks Georgio,
I just noticed that we went off list so I’m copying riak-users back in. I
always forget to reply-all.
Also realised I never asked, what version of Riak are you running (looks
1.4.something?)
On 20 Dec 2013, at 10:01, Georgio Pandarez wrote:
> Hi Russell,
>
> > What about the
Hi Georgio,
With data that small I doubt there is a difference in perf.
Can I get some more info, please?
Are you getting 2400 reqs a second against a single key? What backend are you
using? What is the spec of the machines? Are they real or on some cloud?
Network?
Is this perf figure agains
Hi Guys,
I'm still evaluating riak & riak-cs.
On my five node cluster, with riak only, I am only able to do 2400 requests
per second. I have two keys, one a one byte key, and another a 4kb key, the
performance doesn't change against either.
Is this the best that I can expect to get from this, I
15 matches
Mail list logo