---
Jeremiah Peschka - Founder, Brent Ozar Unlimited
MCITP: SQL Server 2008, MVP
Cloudera Certified Developer for Apache Hadoop
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 10:27 PM, fxmy wang fxm...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the response, Jeremiah.
Then here are my questions:
1) To get better writing
I just got this right after installing Riak and restarting (Ubuntu 12.04.2)
Node name should be riak@10.173.240.5 but is different in this error msg.
Vm.args had a correct name ie. riak@10.173.240.5
Moving content /var/lib/riak, killing all riak processes and manual launch
via riak start
fixed
Hi,
What's a good value for transfer limit when re-arranging adding/removing
nodes?
Or if there is a generic rule of thumb like physical nodes, processors, etc.
Once transfer is completed, is it a good practice to set it back to its
default value or should the calculated (guessed?) transfer
I'm using 2i to model a document has many revisions so the index name is
a lower case string and the indexed keys are formatted as timestamp_uuid.
When I query 2i to grab last revisions on OSX they're always returned
correctly, as per riak docs say 2i sorting happens first by index name and
then
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Matthew Von-Maszewski
matth...@basho.comwrote:
Google's designed leveldb to always assume it was not cleanly shutdown.
If the startup can read the most recent MANIFEST file, leveldb cleans up
the rest of the mess.
However, using the backup strategy
On Jan 27, 2014, at 3:06 PM, Elias Levy fearsome.lucid...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 11:57 AM, Matthew Von-Maszewski matth...@basho.com
wrote:
Google's designed leveldb to always assume it was not cleanly shutdown. If
the startup can read the most recent MANIFEST file,
Hi Elias,
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Elias Levy fearsome.lucid...@gmail.comwrote:
Any comments on the backup strategy for Yokozuna? Will it make use of
Solr's Replication Handler, or something more lower level? Will the node
need to be offline to backup it up?
There is no use of
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Ryan Zezeski rzeze...@basho.com wrote:
Any comments on the backup strategy for Yokozuna? Will it make use of
Solr's Replication Handler, or something more lower level? Will the node
need to be offline to backup it up?
There is no use of any Solr
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Elias Levy fearsome.lucid...@gmail.comwrote:
So it would appear to do it properly, we'd need some support from Yokozuna
to take the snapshot, return a list of files to backup or back them up
itself (hard links?), and then to allow an application to signal it
On Sun, Jan 26, 2014 at 7:41 PM, ender extr...@gmail.com wrote:
I am continuously getting the following types of errors in my riak logs:
2014-01-27 00:06:39.735 [error] 0.220.0 Supervisor riak_pipe_builder_sup
had child undefined started with {riak_pipe_builder,start_link,undefined}
at
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Ryan Zezeski rzeze...@basho.com wrote:
I see you are doing a disjunction search across the type field `(type:image
type:video type:FacebookPost)`. How many documents match that sub-query?
If it is over 100k then legacy Riak Search will fail to return on the
Hey Basho gang,
Have you all taken any sort of look at FB's leveldb fork, rocksdb,
http://rocksdb.org/? Just watching Dhruba's video it seems like it may be a
useful upgrade,
Hi there everyone!
I would like to know, if my current application is a good use case to set
last_write_wins to true.
Basically I have a cluster of node.js workers reading and writing to riak.
Each node.js worker is responsible for a set of keys, so I can guarantee
some kind of non distributed
Basho's leveldb requirements have lead to different optimizations. Facebook
has a captive hardware environment and usage case that does not match ours. I
am not saying their changes are better or worse, only different.
Basho needs:
- multiple databases running simultaneously: 6 to 64
-
P.S. I failed to include the link to the wiki page that discusses each of
Basho's optimizations for the Riak environment:
https://github.com/basho/leveldb/wiki
On Jan 27, 2014, at 8:49 PM, Matthew Von-Maszewski matth...@basho.com wrote:
Basho's leveldb requirements have lead to different
Awesome. I knew there were basho optimizations. Just wondering if there was
parity. Cool!
@siculars
http://siculars.posthaven.com
Sent from my iRotaryPhone
On Jan 27, 2014, at 17:53, Matthew Von-Maszewski matth...@basho.com wrote:
P.S. I failed to include the link to the wiki page that
16 matches
Mail list logo