We're using a number of Riak 1.4 nodes in a cluster. In front of it is
our java-based Storage-Backend (our own version of Riak-CS, custom
built to our requirements), which connects to localhost Riak. The Riak
nodes are linked over IPSec-links. All of this is running on cheap
commodity hardware,
I'm a sysadmin and I managing 5 cluster of RIAK:
- two of them are LXC containers on the same physical machine (3 nodes
per cluster)
- one of them are LXC containers located on different physical
machines (6 nodes)
- one of them are LXC containers located on different physical
machines and XEN
What versions of Riak are you using? And are these CRDT sets?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 22, 2014, at 16:04, Claudio Cesar Sanchez Tejeda
demoncc...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a sysadmin and I managing 5 cluster of RIAK:
- two of them are LXC containers on the same physical machine (3 nodes
I'm a sysadmin and I managing 5 cluster of RIAK:
- two of them are LXC containers on the same physical machine (3 nodes
per cluster)
- one of them are LXC containers located on different physical
machines (6 nodes)
- one of them are LXC containers located on different physical
machines and XEN
Same client code writing to all 5 clusters?
How does the config of the 5th cluster differ from the first 4?
Quick notes:
Minimum of 5 nodes for a production deployment to ensure the default 3 replicas
are all on different physical nodes. Which is a good segue into the fact that
you shouldn't
Hi,
Sorry, I forgot to mention that it is RIAK 1.4.10. They are configured
with multibackend. We are using, memory, bitcask and elevelDB
backends.
On the buckets where we are having issues, the siblings are disabled
(allow_multi = false).
Regards.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 9:17 PM, Sargun
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 11:54 PM, Alexander Sicular sicul...@gmail.com wrote:
Same client code writing to all 5 clusters?
Yes, it is the same code.
How does the config of the 5th cluster differ from the first 4?
Two clusters have one more memory backend configured (they are
configured
