Hi All, Just wanted to put out an observation and see if it's either just me, or something expected.
I've begun updating our large Riak 1.4 cluster to Riak 2.0. Each cluster has 43TB spread evenly over 32 nodes. The riak 2.0 test nodes, after running for 14 days, have on average around 5% more disk usage (in terms of size, not IOPS) than the riak 1.4 cluster. Given that the cluster is evenly balanced, I'd expect all nodes to be roughly the same size (or at least within a point or two). Is this expected? Does this have something to do with the dynamic settings for the leveldb configuration parameters that is built into Riak 2? The issue isn't a big one. I'm just curious if this is expected / anticipated, as it'll probably be worth noting in the Riak documentation as part of the upgrade process. Thanks! -Wes
_______________________________________________ riak-users mailing list riak-users@lists.basho.com http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
