> On May 5, 2015, at 11:44 AM, Sadykov Rustem wrote:
>
> Hi.
> I've increased number of JS machines for map and reduce to 32 and now I don't
> get this strange behaviour (now on every query I get same results count), so
> it looks like the problem is solved on riak 1.4.10, but I still get diff
> "Christopher" == Christopher Meiklejohn writes:
Christopher> I’m a bit concerned with your use of the set embedded in the
Christopher> map.
The original idea was to use a Set directly. The Set-in-Map thing was
just a thought experiment (Map-in-Set would make more sense).
Chris
Hi.
I've increased number of JS machines for map and reduce to 32 and now I don't
get this strange behaviour (now on every query I get same results count), so it
looks like the problem is solved on riak 1.4.10, but I still get different
results when I try to use riak 2.1.0 (even if I increase nu
> On May 5, 2015, at 1:01 PM, Gergely Nagy
> wrote:
>
>> "Christopher" == Christopher Meiklejohn writes:
>
>Christopher> I’m a bit concerned with your use of the set embedded in the
>Christopher> map.
>
> The original idea was to use a Set directly. The Set-in-Map thing was
> jus
> "Christopher" == Christopher Meiklejohn writes:
>> The intention is to store log messages in each element of the set:
>> either as a string (syslog or json, or whatever else the user sees fit),
>> or as a map of key-value pairs (where values themselves can be maps
>> too).
First off, Parth, this is a really exciting project, and I'm glad you're taking
it on.
As an SIEM refugee, I have a few questions about the proposal and a few
thoughts about syslog, generally, and that may help you work out some of your
thoughts about data types and how you plan to structure da
Scott - thanks for the response,
yes i've used all those tools at one point, but i'm not sure
exactly what i'm looking for or what to do with the output.
i've restarted my cluster again but next time it happens,
i'll attach some output/snapshot files.
~ Jason
On 04.05.2015 19:32, Scott Ly
