Amao Wang,
Would you send the riak-diag from the machine receiving the handoff,
10.21.136.93?
Thank you,
Matthew
> On Jul 30, 2015, at 5:35 AM, changmao wang wrote:
>
> Hi Riak-users group,
>
> I have found some errors related to handoff of partition in
> /etc/riak/log/errors.
> Details are
Amao,
As I've mentioned, those pending transfers are going to stay there
indefinitely. They will keep showing up on the 'status' list, until you do
a 'force-replace' or 'force-remove'.
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.b
There are so many pending transfer on production server . That is different
between production and developing, that is my concern.
Sent from my iPhone
> On 2015年8月15日, at 上午3:00, Dmitri Zagidulin wrote:
>
> Pending 0% just means no pending transfers, the cluster state is stable.
>
> If you'v
Hello all,
Are the search suggestions on
http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/using/application-guide/#Search still
valid?
Specifically, is it still advisable to use 2i when deep pagination is required,
and if the cluster is going to be larger than 8-10 nodes should I still use
something
+1
I was thinking of asking the same question.
Concretely, I have been using Riak search to feed data into a machine
learning algorithm. For example, we have a query that returns 4M documents
and we feed it to the algorithm by iterating through the pages. We've
observed a linear decrease in throu
