Hi Joe,
A standalone node should behave similarly to a clustered node in terms of
data persistence. Actually, I use single-node Riak setups (inside a VM) a
lot for testing. The only differences are ring_size=8 and n_val=1, for
performance reasons.
So, it must be your Riak or VM configuration. Als
I am trying to set up a simple test environment. This environment consists of a
single Riak KV node which has not joined a cluster.
I can populate the single un-clustered node with KV pairs just fine using curl.
However, when I stop the node, and then restart it, all the KV pairs that were
wr
I would advise against search for many reasons. IMO writing two copies of a
value - one in a map (when the entire map is required) and the other in a
separate key (for most cases) will work much better.
You can also store the values of a map in separate keys for
retrieval/updates, and also have a
Yes, we ended up doing that in the end. Was just a usecase where _sometimes_
the map was required as a whole, while _other times_ only a specific entry. I
believe search would help with some of this, but we are still looking into that.
Thanks everyone for your help
Cheers
Cos
> On 25 Feb 2016,
Hi Cosmin,
Sorry for the dumb question, but if you are interested in a specific entry
why not to store it as a separate key? It would be easier for updates, too.
Regards,
Vitaly
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:40 PM, Cosmin Marginean
wrote:
> On 25 Feb 2016, at 19:26, Cosmin Marginean wrote:
>
> Hi
Thanks Russell, that’s good to know
As for search - we haven’t investigated that avenue as we’re not using the
search capabilities yet, but it might be in the future.
Cheers
Cos
> On 25 Feb 2016, at 19:47, Russell Brown wrote:
>
> Not yet. I think that would be cool too.
>
> Right now, a map
Not yet. I think that would be cool too.
Right now, a map is just a riak object.
I guess with Riak Search indexing though, you could get something similar,
maybe?
On 25 Feb 2016, at 19:40, Cosmin Marginean wrote:
> On 25 Feb 2016, at 19:26, Cosmin Marginean wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I couldn’t fi
On 25 Feb 2016, at 19:26, Cosmin Marginean wrote:
Hi,
I couldn’t find this anywhere in the docs: is there a mechanism in Riak to
fetch only one Register (or a specific entry) from a map?
We have a use case where we have a map and need to only get the value for a key
in the map, rather than the
