t may or may not be advantageous for your
> system.
>
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 11:39 Matthew Von-Maszewski <matth...@basho.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Performance gains on write intensive applications.
>>
>> > On Feb 28, 2017, at 11:18 AM, al so <volks...@gmail.com&g
Why would anyone disable AAE in riak 2.x?
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
Implications when *delete_mode *set to 'keep'*?*
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:53 PM, al so <volks...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Present both in Solr and Riak. It's a 1-way replication in MDC. MDC is not
>> the cause unless there is a bug there as well.
>>
>>
>> On T
u have record of the
>> reappeared object in your other cluster?
>>
>> Also, just to confirm, when you say the object reappeared -- it
>> re-appeared in Riak (and subsequently in Solr), correct? Or are you saying
>> you just find the object in Solr (via a search)?
e-appeared in Riak (and subsequently in Solr), correct? Or are you saying
> you just find the object in Solr (via a search)?
>
> -Fred
>
> On Feb 23, 2017, at 1:43 AM, al so <volks...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here is brief env:
>> Riak v 2.0.8 + Solr/ 5 node cluster/ M
>
> Here is brief env:
> Riak v 2.0.8 + Solr/ 5 node cluster/ MDC
>
> Problem:
> Deleted object suddenly resurrected after few days. Solr search query(
> "*:*") was executed around the time of reappearance.
>
> Bucket property for this reappeared object
> {
> "props": {
> "name":
