riak_kv_memory_backend replication

In a multi node cluster with a bucket in memory_backend, will inserting an object in this bucket be replicated to other nodes? -- View this message in context: http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/riak-kv-memory-backend-replication-tp4028258.html Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archi

riak_kv_memory_backend in production

Are there known production installation of riak that uses riak_kv_memory_backend. We have a need to store transient data just in memory ( never hitting persistent store). I'm testing riak on aws with 3 node cluster and looks good so far. Just wanted to find out what kind of setup people are usin

Re: riak_kv_memory_backend in production

Thanks Jared Yes I will be running 5 node cluster in production. Kumar -- View this message in context: http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/riak-kv-memory-backend-in-production-tp4028393p4028395.html Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: riak_kv_memory_backend in production

My ultimate goal is to use Riak as that one nosql solution for most of my needs like 1) In memory immutable data( with guaranteed write and failover so n=3, w=quoram, r=1 ) 2) In memory cache 3) bitask with TTL to store immutable session data (n=3, w=quoram, r=1 ) 4) audit data (n=3, w=1,r=

Javascript count of keys using mapreduce gives different counts

I'm using javascript map reduce to count keys on a bucket with memory backend. Count seem to randomly increase or decrease on subsequent call when no new data is inserted. Call is hitting the same instance in a cluster. Any idea why this might be happening Each count request is made in few second

Counting total items in a backend store with TTL

All, This is kind of like the last thorn before moving with riak implementation for me. My use case for now is storing 1) transient payload in memory backend with ttl 2) storing something similar to user sessions in bitcask with ttl. Since the backend stores are ttl, I need to be able to cou