Thanks for the reply.
The version is riak 1.4.0. I am looking at node.get.fsm.time.mean and
node.get.fsm.time.median. Both increased.
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/fsm-get-time-increase-on-a-less-busy-system-tp4030107p4030112.html
Sent from the
Thanks Hector.
Here is how I executed the script.
I downloaded and installed the erlang shell from
http://www.erlang.org/documentation/doc-5.3/doc/getting_started/getting_started.html
started erlang OTP:
root@MYRIAKNODE otp_src_R16B02]# erl -s toolbar
Erlang R16B02 (erts-5.10.3) [source]
Hi Alex,
Thanks.
I am completely new to erlang. When googling how to run an erlang program, I
came across
http://www.erlang.org/documentation/doc-5.3/doc/getting_started/getting_started.html
. That's how I got started.
To run the script using escript, based on
I ran the script:
https://github.com/basho/riak_nagios/blob/master/src/check_riak_kv_up.erl
I got:
{critical,Unable to get list of services running on ~s: ~p,
['xx.xx.xx.xx',{badrpc,nodedown}]}
I know riak is running fine on this node. badrpc seems to be the culprit.
How do I get
Also, when running
https://github.com/basho/riak_nagios/blob/master/src/check_node.erl
I ran into the error:
** exception error: undefined function getopt:parse/2
in function check_node:main/2 (check_node.erl, line 15)
--
View this message in context:
Thanks for the reply!
So to properly size leveldb memory for riak 1.4, should I just use the
'memory model spreadsheet' attached in the article
(http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/ops/advanced/backends/leveldb/)?
--
View this message in context:
Thanks again!
I have a few questions regarding the new spreadsheet.
'percent reserved', in the spreadsheet, it is set at 10%, we should really
use 50%?
'vnode count', it is 'vnode count per server'?
E11 (max_open_file, with AAE), shows as a static value '10*4*1024*1024',
whereas
Thanks!
The cluster has been in production for 4 months. I found this in leveldb log
file:
013/10/25-12:43:10.678239 7fb895781700 compacted to: files[ 0 1 5 31 51 0 0
]
2013/10/29-16:57:26.280633 7fb895781700 compacted to: files[ 0 2 5 31 51 0 0
]
2013/11/03-11:46:15.935006 7fb895781700 compacted
Does anyone have any insight?
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/tuning-number-of-async-threads-in-Riak-s-default-pool-tp4029628p4029664.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Thanks!
Could you elaborate on it?
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/tuning-number-of-async-threads-in-Riak-s-default-pool-tp4029628p4029666.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
There is a section in
http://docs.basho.com/riak/1.4.0/cookbooks/Linux-Performance-Tuning/:
If using LevelDB as the storage backend (which maintains its own I/O thread
pool), the number of async threads in Riak's default pool can be decreased
in the /etc/riak/vm.args file:
+A 16
Can I please
I think the below setting is what we want to use for our environment
r = 1
notfound_ok=false
basic_quorum = true
the client gets notfound if the first two replies are notfound? if the
first
reply is found, the client gets found? if the first reply is notfound, the
second is found, does the
I read the documentation again
(http://docs.basho.com/riak/latest/dev/references/http/fetch-object/).
r - (read quorum) how many replicas need to agree when retrieving the object
(default is defined by the bucket)
pr - how many primary replicas need to be online when doing the read
(default is
We have a 5 node riak cluster to store site images, with N=3, R=1. When we
turned off one node, a lot of GET requests failed, which made me think those
requested images (3 copies of them) all landed on the failed physical node.
Is there a way to tell how the replicas are distributed among the
We were on 1.3.0, I was able to upgrade it to 1.3.2 (sudo rpm -Uvh
riak-1.3.2-2.el6.x86_64.rpm). After that, I was trying to upgrade it to
1.4.0 (sudo rpm -Uvh riak-1.4.0-1.el6.x86_64.rpm). I got:
error: %pre(riak-1.4.0-1.el6.x86_64) scriptlet failed, exit status 8
error: install: %pre scriptlet
Hi,
Thanks for the reply. Sorry, I tried a few times, I did stop it at some
point, still the same result. Just tried again and here is the result:
# riak stop
Attempting to restart script through sudo -H -u riak ok
# riak-admin status
Attempting to restart script through sudo -H -u riak Node
Update -- we found the issue. There were some post requests coming in from a
form, obviously not using image content type. We tried:
curl -v -s -o/dev/null http://xx:8098/riak/45/21601_7803328_3.jpg --
Fails
curl -v -s -o/dev/null -H Accept: image/*
We use a five-node riak cluster to store site images, the codes is written in
php using the riak php client library. From time to time, we save the right
keys but with 0 byte image files (the image files provided are legit). I
checked riak log files but could not find anything relevant. Does
18 matches
Mail list logo