Riak is known to be working on bucket-destruction, and we're using a sparse
keyspace/bucket-name.
The question is: Do we fill the bucket with users, or just use it as a
meta-concept to link to subscriber buckets?
Thanks!
-mox
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 8:55 PM, Dmitry Demeshchuk wrote:
> Something
Something tells me that Riak's current design is not well-suited for
pub-sub, especially with frequent channels removing.
However, I think innostore backend can give you such functionalities.
What you'll need is:
1. Add first_key and next_key functionalities to Riak itself (they'll
give you the f
Pub-sub style, with frequent unsub and channel destruction.
-Mike
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Dan Reverri wrote:
> Can you describe a bit more what you are trying to model?
>
> Thanks,
> Dan
>
> Daniel Reverri
> Developer Advocate
> Basho Technologies, Inc.
> d...@basho.com
>
>
> On Fri, Ap
Can you describe a bit more what you are trying to model?
Thanks,
Dan
Daniel Reverri
Developer Advocate
Basho Technologies, Inc.
d...@basho.com
On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Mike Oxford wrote:
> In Riak design, with a given bucket of "subscribers" would it be better to
> use the bucket as a
In Riak design, with a given bucket of "subscribers" would it be better to
use the bucket as an actual container of users (denormallized) or use Riak's
linking feature?
While both will work, there are surely some under-the-covers things to
consider...
Thanks!
-mox
___
