Is Riak dead? No new activities on Riak GitHub repo.
https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/pulse/monthly
<https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/pulse/monthly>
https://github.com/basho/riak/pulse/monthly
<https://github.com/basho/riak/pulse/monthly
Peelikkampatti
wrote:
> Is Riak dead? No new activities on Riak GitHub repo.
>
> https://github.com/basho/riak_kv/pulse/monthly
> https://github.com/basho/riak/pulse/monthly
>
> Thanks,
> Senthil
> ___
> riak-user
> users and community were served very badly by Basho these last couple of
> years. It’s a little trodden under, but no way dead. Give it a little time to
> bounce back.
>
> Cheers
>
> Russell
>
>
> On 11 Jul 2017, at 08:15, Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti
> wrote:
>
y were served very badly by Basho these last couple of
>> years. It’s a little trodden under, but no way dead. Give it a little time
>> to bounce back.
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Russell
>>
>>
>> On 11 Jul 2017, at 08:15, Senthilkumar Peelikkampat
t;
> >> Cheers
> >>
> >> Russell
> >>
> >>
> >> On 11 Jul 2017, at 08:15, Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti <
> sendto...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Is Riak dead? No new activities on Riak GitHub repo.
> >>>
>
this
>> >> could be a very good thing for Riak in the medium to long term. It and
>> >> it’s
>> >> users and community were served very badly by Basho these last couple of
>> >> years. It’s a little trodden under, but no way dead. Give it a l
) If you’re asking
> me, this
> >> >> could be a very good thing for Riak in the medium to long term. It
> and it’s
> >> >> users and community were served very badly by Basho these last
> couple of
> >> >> years. It’s a little trodden under, but no way
gt; >> the
>> >> >> existing partners (Erlang Solutions, Trifork etc.) If you’re asking
>> >> >> me, this
>> >> >> could be a very good thing for Riak in the medium to long term. It
>> >&
--Original Message-
From: "Russell Brown"
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:40pm
To: "Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti"
Cc: "riak-users"
Subject: Re: Is Riak dead?
Hi Senthilkumar,
No Riak is not dead. It’s parent company, Basho is dead. And they kept the
keys. There are
-Original Message-
> From: "Russell Brown"
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:40pm
> To: "Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti"
> Cc: "riak-users"
> Subject: Re: Is Riak dead?
>
> Hi Senthilkumar,
> No Riak is not dead. It’s parent company, Bas
oo great not to be worth deep thought and prudent action.
All the best,
LRP
-Original Message-From: "Russell Brown" Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:40pmTo: "Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti" Cc: "riak-users" Subject: Re: Is Riak dead?
Hi Senthilkumar,No Ri
l Message-
> From: "Russell Brown"
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 12:40pm
> To: "Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti"
> Cc: "riak-users"
> Subject: Re: Is Riak dead?
>
> Hi Senthilkumar,
> No Riak is not dead. It’s parent company, Basho is dead.
; It's just too great not to be worth deep thought and prudent action.
>>
>>
>>
>> All the best,
>>
>>
>>
>> LRP
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: "Russell Brown"
>> Sent
re: roadmap and governance.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It's just too great not to be worth deep thought and prudent action.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> LRP
>>>
>>>
>>&g
>>>
> >>>
> >>> It's just too great not to be worth deep thought and prudent action.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> All the best,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> LRP
> >&
>>>
>> >>>
>> >>> It's just too great not to be worth deep thought and prudent action.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> All the best,
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
Riak?
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I'm sure there are many good ideas out there re: roadmap and
>>> governance.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>
map and governance.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> It's just too great not to be worth deep thought and prudent action.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> All the best,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>&
>> >>> I'm sure there are many good ideas out there re: roadmap and governance.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> It's just too great not to be worth deep thought and prudent action.
>> >>>
>> >&g
erence
> focused on
> >> >>> the future of open-source Riak?
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I'm sure there are many good ideas out there re: roadmap and
> governance.
> >> >&g
;>> Hmmm--- I wonder if anyone has given thought to a conference
>> focused on
>> >> >>> the future of open-source Riak?
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> I'm sure there are
>
>>> >> >> wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> We have talked about it. Let's do it!
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> On Jul 13, 2017 7:56 PM, ll...@writersglen.com wrote:
>>> >> >>>
>>> >> >>> Hmmm
--Original Message-
From: "Russell Brown"
Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 4:00pm
To: ll...@writersglen.com
Cc: "riak-users" , "Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti"
, "Russell Brown"
Subject: Re: Is Riak dead?
We have talked about it. Let's do it!
On J
>
> 2. How can we pin down an agenda?
>
> 3. Can we get corporate sponsorships to minimize registration?
>
> 4. How can we most widely promote the event?
>
> 5. What else?
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Lloyd
>
>
>
>
>
> -Origi
4. How can we most widely promote the event?
>
> 5. What else?
>
>
>
> All the best,
>
>
>
> Lloyd
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Russell Brown"
> Sent: Thursday, July 13, 2017 4:00pm
> To: ll...@writersglen.com
>
ere to there:
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. Is there enough interest on the mailing list?
>>
>> 2. How can we pin down an agenda?
>>
>> 3. Can we get corporate sponsorships to minimize registration?
>>
>> 4. How can we most widely promote the event?
>>
>> 5. What e
expanding the open-source community
> >>
> >> 3. Saturday (or Saturday morning)
> >>
> >> Discussion sessions with goal of recommendations for moving forward
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> How to get from here to there:
> >>
> >&
> On Jul 14, 2017, at 11:32, Russell Brown wrote:
>
> What do you mean “encumbered”? Riak is the name of an Apache2 licensed open
> source database, so it can continue to be used to describe that apache 2
> licensed database, please don’t spread FUD.
You willing to invest time in a project t
Looks like Basho has the trademark on Riak.
http://www.trademarkia.com/riak-77954950.html
- Peace
Dave
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:08 PM, Alexander Sicular
wrote:
>
>
> > On Jul 14, 2017, at 11:32, Russell Brown wrote:
> >
> > What do you mean “encumbered”? Riak is the name of an Apache2 licens
On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:08, Alexander Sicular wrote:
>
>
>> On Jul 14, 2017, at 11:32, Russell Brown wrote:
>>
>> What do you mean “encumbered”? Riak is the name of an Apache2 licensed open
>> source database, so it can continue to be used to describe that apache 2
>> licensed database, plea
On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:17, Dave King wrote:
> Looks like Basho has the trademark on Riak.
> http://www.trademarkia.com/riak-77954950.html
They sure do. And if you look at the Apache2 license you’ll see that it grants
use of the name to identify the source.
Look, I’m not a lawyer, and I’m guess
On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:26, Dave King wrote:
> 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade names,
> trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, except as
> required for reasonable and customary use in describing the origin of the
> Work and reproducin
6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, except
as required for reasonable and customary use in describing the origin of
the Work and reproducing the content of the NOTICE file.
So At minimum I read t
Message-
From: "Russell Brown"
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 12:32pm
To: "Alexander Sicular"
Cc: ll...@writersglen.com, "Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti" ,
"riak-users"
Subject: Re: Is Riak dead?
On 14 Jul 2017, at 17:26, Alexander Sicular wrote:
> I lov
No, but I can read.
- Peace
Dave
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Russell Brown
wrote:
>
> On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:26, Dave King wrote:
>
> > 6. Trademarks. This License does not grant permission to use the trade
> names, trademarks, service marks, or product names of the Licensor, except
> as
On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:28, Dave King wrote:
> No, but I can read.
I read it too. I’m not sure what your point is. A day may come when the name
has to change?
>
> - Peace
> Dave
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:27 PM, Russell Brown wrote:
>
> On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:26, Dave King wrote:
>
>
You asked what difference the tm made. The tm invokes clause 6. So yes it
means moving forward means a new name. That's one of the things to be
considered.
- Peace
Dave
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 4:30 PM, Russell Brown
wrote:
>
> On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:28, Dave King wrote:
>
> > No, but I can
On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:36, Dave King wrote:
> You asked what difference the tm made. The tm invokes clause 6. So yes it
> means moving forward means a new name. That's one of the things to be
> considered.
Agree, so if we’re sticking to the subject, “Is Riak dead?” the
Perhaps we can get overview of legal issues and options here:
http://www.softwarefreedom.org/services/
Best,
Lloyd
-Original Message-
From: "Russell Brown"
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 6:30pm
To: "Dave King"
Cc: "Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti" , "riak
ere:
>
> http://www.softwarefreedom.org/services/
>
> Best,
>
> Lloyd
>
> -Original Message-
> From: "Russell Brown"
> Sent: Friday, July 14, 2017 6:30pm
> To: "Dave King"
> Cc: "Senthilkumar Peelikkampatti" , "riak-users&q
clause 6. So yes it
>> means moving forward means a new name. That's one of the things to be
>> considered.
>
> Agree, so if we’re sticking to the subject, “Is Riak dead?” the worst case
> is: “No, but potentially the name could be some time in the future”, right?
&
s it
>>> means moving forward means a new name. That's one of the things to be
>>> considered.
>>
>> Agree, so if we’re sticking to the subject, “Is Riak dead?” the worst case
>> is: “No, but potentially the name could be some time in the future”, right?
>>
rs is a large part of what did for Basho.
On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Russell Brown wrote:
On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:36, Dave King wrote:
You asked what difference the tm made. The tm invokes clause 6. So yes it
means moving forward means a new name. That's one of the things to be
g the core users is a large part of what did for
>> Basho.
>>
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Russell Brown
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 14 Jul 2017, at 23:36, Dave King wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>
ment. I think now is the time to shore up the existing
>> customers who want to stay with Riak. Chasing non-existent new business
>> whilst ignoring the core users is a large part of what did for Basho.
>>
>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 5:41 PM, Russel
7;t already using Riak. That's today, the
>>>> story may change tomorrow.
>>> Again, I disagree, but I’m personally not that interested in looking for
>>> new Riak users at the moment. I think now is the time to shore up the
>>> existing customers w
m not dancing on anyone's grave. Im a big fan of Riak, you know? I'm
>>>>> just pointing out that there is in fact a grave and if there is any hope
>>>>> for a Riak future the project will have to rebrand.
>>>> This is the thing we disagree on. But like I said b
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Carlos Baquero Moreno
wrote:
>
> It is sad to see Basho dying, but good to see that there is hope that Riak
> will survive. Being an open source database was very important for academics
> to experiment and propose solutions. Not everything makes sense in an act
48 matches
Mail list logo
