Re: Partition distribution between nodes

2014-06-05 Thread Luke Bakken
From: Luke Bakken lbak...@basho.com Date: Monday 2 June 2014 19:34 To: Manu Maki m.m...@comparegroup.eu Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.com riak-users@lists.basho.com Subject: Re: Partition distribution between nodes Hi Manu, I see similar vnode distribution in my local dev cluster

Re: Partition distribution between nodes

2014-06-03 Thread Manu Mäki - Compare Group
...@comparegroup.eumailto:m.m...@comparegroup.eu Cc: riak-users@lists.basho.commailto:riak-users@lists.basho.com riak-users@lists.basho.commailto:riak-users@lists.basho.com Subject: Re: Partition distribution between nodes Hi Manu, I see similar vnode distribution in my local dev cluster. This is due

Partition distribution between nodes

2014-06-02 Thread Manu Mäki - Compare Group
Hi all, In the beginning we were running four nodes with n-value of 2. The partitions were distributed 25% for each node. Now when we added fifth node (still having n-value of 2), the partitions are distributed in following way: 25%, 19%, 19%, 19% and 19%. The ring size in use is 64. Is this

Re: Partition distribution between nodes

2014-06-02 Thread Luke Bakken
Hi Manu, I see similar vnode distribution in my local dev cluster. This is due to 64 not being evenly divisible by 5. 4 nodes: $ dev1/bin/riak-admin member-status = Membership == Status RingPendingNode