On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:24PM -0700, Ben Tilly wrote:
> It sounds like you understood perfectly.
>
> Basically we are running a cluster of machines that are busy doing
> lots of stuff. We wanted to use Riak to keep configuration
> information about those machines and the stuff they were doin
It sounds like you understood perfectly.
Basically we are running a cluster of machines that are busy doing
lots of stuff. We wanted to use Riak to keep configuration
information about those machines and the stuff they were doing. So
Riak would be running on machines whose primary job is somethi
Ben,
I hate non-obvious behavior too, and it's something we constantly try to
fight at Basho. That said, I don't think Riak is in as bad a position as
you think. Lets see if I can convince you :)
If I'm understanding you correctly you are making two points here:
1) When performing a join/leave
I am not a developer advocate. But my top hate is that when machines
leave/rejoin your data can be inaccessable for some time.
We had a great case where we wanted to use Riak, but that was a
complete showstopper and we won't be using it because of that. (We
wanted to store information which need
+1
hornbeck
VP Client Services
Basho Technologies
On Jun 9, 2011, at 13:52, Scott Gonyea wrote:
> While I am not a Developer Advocate, I hate that I cannot play Angry Birds
> using the Basho logo.
>
> On Jun 9, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Srdjan Pejic wrote:
>
>> What do you guys hate about Riak r
While I am not a Developer Advocate, I hate that I cannot play Angry Birds
using the Basho logo.
On Jun 9, 2011, at 10:25 AM, Srdjan Pejic wrote:
> What do you guys hate about Riak right now?
> ___
> riak-users mailing list
> riak-users@lists.basho.co
What do you guys hate about Riak right now?
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman/listinfo/riak-users_lists.basho.com
