e, the hardware and overall throughput -
that will help.
Thanks.
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Yokozuna-Scale-tp4031808.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
riak-users mail
ment on the deployment size, the hardware and overall throughput -
> that will help.
You may be deploying the first Yokozuna deployment of that size. I'm interested
in your results. If this is a fixed set of documents, you may get away with a
lower
n_val such as 2. Furthermore, you can try incr
6M inserts, 0.8M updates -
and this may triple in about a couple of months or so as our other modules
that generate and dump this data scale further.
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Yokozuna-Scale-tp4031808p4031810.html
Sent from the Riak Users mail
t; and this may triple in about a couple of months or so as our other modules
> that generate and dump this data scale further.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Yokozuna-Scale-tp4031808p4031810.html
> Sent fro
.
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Yokozuna-Scale-tp4031808p4031812.html
Sent from the Riak Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
riak-users mailing list
riak-users@lists.basho.com
http://lists.basho.com/mailman
On Sep 18, 2014, at 4:20 AM, anandm wrote:
> Yes - looks like its going that way too - a decoupling between the Solr Cloud
> and the Riak Cluster seems like a solution that could work out and then
> Yokozuna to index content out to the Solr Cloud (completely external to riak
> - Solr not made to
Yes Ryan - that aspect is pretty clear. So with 1-1 riak-solr Yokozuna
deployment scale to my requirement? Am I missing something here when
thinking it wouldn't?
--
View this message in context:
http://riak-users.197444.n3.nabble.com/Yokozuna-Scale-tp4031808p4031814.html
Sent from the
On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:35 AM, anandm wrote:
> Yes Ryan - that aspect is pretty clear. So with 1-1 riak-solr Yokozuna
> deployment scale to my requirement? Am I missing something here when
> thinking it wouldn't?
I haven’t followed this thread closely, it was just your last
email that caught my