>Vincent is right, actually. The email does appear in the source code for
>the page. But as he points out, it does take a more clever robot to
>catch it.
OK, I see what you mean if I scroll off the bottom of the page - they have some hidden
form variables there that allow readers to reply to the
> >Well, the email does still appear in the page (see the end of the
> >code),
>
> Nope, see: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01770.html
> But the URL to my WWW page, which contains my email :-) is
> still there. Note the delay in updating the archive, and the
> need to refresh
>Congratulations!
Thanks for all your advice :-)
>Well, the email does still appear in the page (see the end of the code),
Nope, see: http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01770.html
But the URL to my WWW page, which contains my email :-) is still there.
Note the delay in updating t
> And I just noticed that the archiver has become more advanced so that
> email addresses are removed, even from the text. E.g.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] will not show up in the archive. That should
> make the spam weary rest more easy.
Well, the email does still appear in the page (see the end of t
And I just noticed that the archiver has become more advanced so that
email addresses are removed, even from the text. E.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] will not show up in the archive. That should
make the spam weary rest more easy.
Best regards,
Jens
>
> Just another test. If this works we should have t
Congratulations!
And many thanks.
Jens
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Hewat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 23. februar 2004 17:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Test of new Rietveld Archive
>
>
>
> Just another test. If this works we should have this message
> archived
