It is a separate question to what extent those distributions are
"physical"...
Simple attempts to establish that at least the size distributions
obtained from a mixture of two samples with same composition
and two very different size distributions, are close to the
expected result, establishing so
This is where the real fun starts (if you're a masochist!). I just finished
doing some work along those lines this afternoon, and managed to get it to
work(ish) eventually. The double-Voigt analysis can give you Dv (volume
weighted domain size) and Ds (surface weighted domain size). If you assum
What I remember is that "Breadth" outputs the distributions. What might
be the solution is to convert (write a program) Rietveld "peak output"
to "Breadth" input. However, I have never done this myself; I converted
Xfit-style
peak files only, which is pretty straightforward.
It is a separate ques
Hi Venkat,
If you mean to use rietveld on X-ray data I don't think you can get
particle size distributions. X=ray data will give you an average
crystallite size but this is not a distribution just an average. Also, it
is crystallite size and the actual particles size can be different if the
I am a new user of rietveld softwares. Can anyone suggest me any program or
software based on reitveld algorithm and giving the following results...
1) size distribution of particles in a sample.
yours sincerely
venkat
ISIS is a world leading facility for condensed matter research using neutron
scattering and muon spectroscopy, with a strong scientific user programme
and extensive international links.
ISIS is in a period of major expansion, including the construction of a
second Target Station, with an initial
Seriously Thanks guys I did not know about this site till I retired and
have wished I knew a lot earlier.
Try also the dissident SDPD Mailing List :
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sdpd/
(though Sir Kenneth is also a subscriber...).
Armel
Don't worry, it is only funny. And now is funny even more (my opinion)
Nicolae Popa
> Dear Respected Sir,
> Have I done anything wrong! I am really scared, because I am not that
much sound in english.
> I wrote like that because I respect Prof. Armel very much.
>
> Please forgive me if there
Dear Dr Apu,
Don't worry. You have done nothing wrong. It is just a private Anglo-French
joke, and it is not (yet) forbidden to make jokes :-) I am sure Armel will be
delighted - he has been called worse things :-)
Alan.
At 10:10 18/11/2004, you wrote:
>Please forgive me if there were some thin
Dear Respected Sir,
Have I done anything wrong! I am really scared, because I am not that much
sound in english.
I wrote like that because I respect Prof. Armel very much.
Please forgive me if there were some thing wrong or funny.
With best regards,
Apu
/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/
It was written
> Dear Sir Armel
>Presumably this long-overdue recognition must be part of the centenary
> celebrations of the "Entente Cordiale"?
Don't tease him - He deserves it - besides I am learning a lot.
>From one who reads and has not commented - Yet
Seriously Thanks guys I did not kno
Apu wrote..
> Dear Sir Armel
Presumably this long-overdue recognition
must be part of the centenary celebrations
of the "Entente Cordiale"?
12 matches
Mail list logo
