Hello Everybody,
Dr. Von Dreele, Thanks for the information. Yes, it
really worked when I used starting values that you
suggested. Only function number 3, which is the second
derivative of the 1th diffuse function, worked in my
case. May be my diffuse background is little
complicated (it contain l
Dear Milinda,
You can (with care) refine a "true" background under the diffuse
function. It may couple really strongly with the diffuse one tho. The
"R" and maybe "U" coefficients can be interpreted as giving local
structure information (distance & variation).
Bob
R.B. Von Dreele
IPNS Division
Arg
sounds like a problem for PDF :)
Simon
milinda a wrote:
Hello Everybody,
Dr. Von Dreele, Thanks for the information. Yes, it
really worked when I used starting values that you
suggested. Only function number 3, which is the second
derivative of the 1th diffuse function, worked in my
case. May
Dear Dr.Billinge,
Thanks for the reply. Yes I agree with you, PDF is the
best way to solve this diffuse background
simultaneously with the Bragg contribution. However,
the problem is low upper limit of Q, it is about 6A-1
in Q. Therefore, if I Fourier-transformed my data set,
Fourier transform wil
Title: FW: Text for Rietveld Listserve Submission
Don’t miss the….
Rietveld Refinement and Indexing Workshop
27-29 September 2006
Hosted by the International Centre for Diffraction Data
ICDD Headquarters, Newtown Square, PA
This workshop will introduce the theory and formalisms of vari
