All deviations from expected values (1.514 and 1.634) are within 3 e.s.u.s
that are around 0.03 A in average.
About absurdity, there are different sensibilities...
With such a definition above, 1.72(3) instead of 1.634 is just OK for
Leonid. Where would he see a limit before applying
Hello Ahmed.
It depends on the method you use. For Rietveld, you need quite a lot of
parameters, i.e., both sample (structural) parameters and instrumental
parameters. Regarding the first group, you have diadochy and defects, that
make your sample (or its components) differ from the standards you
I mean, Leonid refuse to see any reliability limit to
the powder results. Absurdity does not exist at all
for him (with the exception of mine apparently).
The difference between us is that I am happy with
1.634(2) but already think that soft restraints are
clearly needed when I have 1.72(3).
All deviations from expected values (1.514 and 1.634) are within 3 e.s.u.s
that are around 0.03 A in average.
About absurdity, there are different sensibilities...
With such a definition above, 1.72(3) instead of 1.634 is just OK for
Leonid. Where would he see a limit before applying
I think that Alan is right in that we should stop this thread since we
reach such high matters as absurdity and crime.
The end words can be the following :
Most journals have place for supplementary materials.
May be even Leonid could be happy if three tables were presented, 1- the
raw
remember the previous discussion at the
Rietveld list where he claimed that all H
can be seen and refined independently, always.
Absurd - never said so.
From
absurdity and crimes we arrived at falsifications?
Not sure that your young students have received
a complete formation if they have to
At 03:04 02/08/2013 -0700, Leonid Solovyov wrote:
remember the previous discussion at the
Rietveld list where he claimed that all H
can be seen and refined independently, always.
Absurd - never said so.
From absurdity and crimes we arrived at falsifications?
Below are the unfalsified words.
Thanks for
the correct citation where the term “always” is definitely absent.
A bit Better,
Leonid
***
Leonid A. Solovyov
Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology
660049, K. Marx 42, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
From absurdity and crimes we arrived at falsifications?
Ugly yours, with pestilence,
PS- rigid brain is the first step before rigid body
OK, I asked people to stop this argument. The essential points have
been covered, so I am restraining the two principal antagonists from
posting for a 1 week
Thanks to all who replied about this, and in particular to those who
offered parts and suggested that Hiltonbrooks (UK) had such spare
parts for old equipment - http://www.xrays.u-net.com. My colleague now
thinks his workshop might be able repair the original piece, so is
holding off on following
10 matches
Mail list logo
