Dear Frantisek,
>I have tried the 0.26 and 0.14° FDS, however a large "beam overflow" has
>occurred. Moreover, the intensities of diffractions at higher angles are very
>low in comparison to the data collected with ADS slits.
[TW] At θ=1° , 0.26 and 0.14° FDS coresponding to ~39 and ~74 mm
Hi all,
The new NIST SRM for analysis of crystallite size that I have spoken about on a
number of occasions over the years is now available.
SRM 1979 - Powder Diffraction Line Profile Standard for Crystallite Size
Analysis (Nano-Crystalline ZnO Powder)
Dear all,
I would like to ask you about your experience in collecting the XRD data from
low angles (for me from 2° of 2Theta) to 50° 2Theta using the Bruker D8 Advance
diffractometer
(Bragg-Brentano geometry) with the Lynx Eye XE position sensitive detector.
The studied samples are
