Leonid, good point!
Molodetz! Pozdravliaiu!
Have you refined in R-3c?
Nicolae Popa


> Regarding the query of Leopoldo Suescun:
> ”Shouldn´t the IUCr take action and try to influence the journals that
> frequently publish x-ray data (as a complementary characterization
> technique but that determines the validity of other results) to have
> well-trained crystallographers review any article that contains x-ray
> diffraction data?”
>
> Unfortunately, the issue of crystallographic review is problematic even in
> the IUCr journals, especially for powder data. A fresh instance from Acta
> B:
> http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/S205252061500342X
> where the crystal structures of alpha-Fe2O3 and alpha-Cr2O3 are
> “re-refined” to be monoclinic. The monoclinic symmetry is
> “substantiated” by the observation of a “complex” peak broadening
> that, in fact, is well described by the anisotropic strain model available
> in all popular Rietveld programs.
> With such structure validation, all crystal structures may be re-refined,
> potentially, to lower symmetry, as the anisotropic strain broadening is a
> common powder pattern feature.
> If this practice is accepted in an IUCr journal, what can we expect from
> non-crystallographic literature?
>
>  *******************************************************
> Leonid A. Solovyov
> Institute of Chemistry and Chemical Technology
> 660036, Akademgorodok 50/24, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
> http://sites.google.com/site/solovyovleonid
> *******************************************************
>


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Please do NOT attach files to the whole list <alan.he...@neutronoptics.com>
Send commands to <lists...@ill.fr> eg: HELP as the subject with no body text
The Rietveld_L list archive is on http://www.mail-archive.com/rietveld_l@ill.fr/
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Reply via email to