RE: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report

2001-04-20 Thread Miguel Hesiquio Garduno
Hello to all! When will be the next Round Robin on size and strain? Thanks Miguel Hesiquio

RE: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report

2001-04-20 Thread Davor Balzar
> -Original Message- > From: Armel Le Bail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 9:58 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report > related mean size value (or am I pessimistic too ?-). The manuscript > and the n

RE: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report

2001-04-20 Thread Armel Le Bail
>anisotropic size broadening, if included at all, is still mainly >accomplished through Greaves platelets model (cos(phi) correction). This >would work satisfactory in this case, but not for a more complicated >anisotropic size broadening. You are too pessimistic here. The Greaves model was firs

RE: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report

2001-04-20 Thread Davor Balzar
> -Original Message- > From: Armel Le Bail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2001 12:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report > > > > >Well, although the specimen was nearly strain-free, strictly

RE: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report

2001-04-18 Thread Armel Le Bail
>Well, although the specimen was nearly strain-free, strictly speaking this >was still a size-strain round robin; all the participants extracted (or >refined) strain parameters, didn't they :-) Before to start, the Round Robin participants were said : "Although the first sample selected for the

RE: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report

2001-04-18 Thread Davor Balzar
> -Original Message- > From: Armel Le Bail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2001 8:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report > If the Round Robin stops on that first sample, it will be a Size Round > Rob

RE: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report

2001-04-17 Thread Armel Le Bail
Davor Balzar wrote : >I believe that the reason for the former is absence of strain >and a simple specimen (cubic symmetry, spherical crystallites with isotropic >broadening) that was chosen. Some people objected to this, but I think that >was the only possibility to give the round robin a fair c

RE: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report

2001-04-16 Thread Davor Balzar
** -Original Message- From: Leonid Solovyov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 11:14 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report Although my question is addressed to Davor Balzar, I think that the question and the ans

Re: Size/Strain Round Robin - 1st Report

2001-04-13 Thread Leonid Solovyov
Although my question is addressed to Davor Balzar, I think that the question and the answer may also interest other subscribers of SDPD and RIETVELD lists. The First Phase results of the Size-Strain Round-Robin are really impressive and I wonder, will it be possible to get acquainted with techniq