[atlas] Probe with no firmware

I registered my probe almost 2 days ago. when I check on the probe on your site, it is indicated no firmware. I am also unable to get an IP through DHCP. Kindly help.

[atlas] Seven new RIPE Atlas anchors have joined the community

Dear RIPE Atlas users, Seven new RIPE Atlas anchors have been activated bringing the total number to 157. - Three anchors hosted by Leaseweb Network: us-mnz-as30633 in Manassas, Virginia, us-sfo-as7203 in San Francisco, California, and sg-sin-as59253 in Singapore. - jp-tyo-as13901, hosted by A

Re: [atlas] [Request] System tags for DNS resolution

On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 09:32:09AM +0200, Chris Amin wrote a message of 64 lines which said: > I think what is happening here is that all of those probes except > for 17854 have at least *one* resolver which does respond to > queries. OK, I get it. I modified resolve-name

Re: [atlas] Spoofing measurenment

On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 07:01:24PM +0100, Peter Koch wrote a message of 10 lines which said: > while this may sound tempting, I think it would be more helpful in > the long run to maintain atlas probes as a tool to map the Internet > rather than as "spy in the house". Hmmm, the Atlas probe al

Re: [atlas] Spoofing measurenments

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Alexander Lyamin wrote: > Do we have a statistics on what percentage of probes operate behind NAT? There is a tag "IPv4 RFC1918" so you can select all probes with that tag to get that number. > On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Pavel Odintsov > wrote: >> >> Hell

Re: [atlas] Spoofing measurenments

Hello! Could somebody share link to archives with previous discussion of this ethical question? On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:18 PM, Jen Linkova wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Alexander Lyamin wrote: >> Do we have a statistics on what percentage of probes operate behind NAT? > > There i

Re: [atlas] Spoofing measurenments

On Wed, 18 Nov 2015, Pavel Odintsov wrote: Hello! Could somebody share link to archives with previous discussion of this ethical question? https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/2013-September/001005.html http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/nanog/users/174708 ... for instance.

Re: [atlas] Spoofing measurenments

On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:23:33PM +0300, Pavel Odintsov wrote a message of 83 lines which said: > Could somebody share link to archives with previous discussion of this > ethical question? https://www.ripe.net/ripe/mail/archives/ripe-atlas/2013-September/001005.html https://www.ripe.net/ripe

Re: [atlas] Spoofing measurenments

Thanks! Will read it deeply. On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 3:36 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 03:23:33PM +0300, > Pavel Odintsov wrote > a message of 83 lines which said: > >> Could somebody share link to archives with previous discussion of this >> ethical question? > > h

Re: [atlas] Spoofing measurenments

Do we have a statistics on what percentage of probes operate behind NAT? On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 7:03 PM, Pavel Odintsov wrote: > Hello! > > Thanks for answer! > > But actually we have huge issues with IPv4. Could we collect this > stats with full anonymous approach for bitting ethical problem